2019
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Evaluation of Synthetic Terminators for Regulating Mammalian Cell Transgene Expression

Abstract: Tuning heterologous gene expression in mammalian production hosts has predominantly relied upon engineering the promoter elements driving the transcription of the transgene. Moreover, most regulatory elements have borrowed genetic sequences from viral elements. Here, we generate a set of 10 rational and 30 synthetic terminators derived from nonviral elements and evaluate them in the HT1080 and HEK293 cell lines to demonstrate that they are comparable in terms of tuning gene expression/protein output to the vir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rates of each of these processes are shaped by the values of physical parameters that can be used for design (Figure 3C). For example, the transcription rate can be tuned by the choice of promoter (Ede et al, 2016;Haberle and Stark, 2018;Ponjavic et al, 2006) and terminator (Cheng et al, 2019;Proudfoot, 2016), while the translation rate can be tuned by the sequence in the 5 0 and 3 0 UTRs (De Nijs et al, 2020) (such as with the addition of binding sites for endogenous miRNAs (Gam et al, 2018;Michaels et al, 2019)). Similarly, protein degradation can be tuned by adding protein degradation domains (Trauth et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Genetic Device As the Core Unit Of Synthetic Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rates of each of these processes are shaped by the values of physical parameters that can be used for design (Figure 3C). For example, the transcription rate can be tuned by the choice of promoter (Ede et al, 2016;Haberle and Stark, 2018;Ponjavic et al, 2006) and terminator (Cheng et al, 2019;Proudfoot, 2016), while the translation rate can be tuned by the sequence in the 5 0 and 3 0 UTRs (De Nijs et al, 2020) (such as with the addition of binding sites for endogenous miRNAs (Gam et al, 2018;Michaels et al, 2019)). Similarly, protein degradation can be tuned by adding protein degradation domains (Trauth et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Genetic Device As the Core Unit Of Synthetic Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tremendous efforts have been made in the forward engineering of RNA tools with predefined performance. , However, it is still a huge challenge to design intrinsic terminators because of the complicated relationship between sequence and efficiency, although some terminator models are able to predict the TE for a given sequence. , Typically, the synthetic terminators are generated by screening random sequences or by re-engineering endogenous terminators . These strategies require tremendous, tedious, and repetitive screening work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate whether mRNA secondary structure in the 3′-UTR region may directly impact protein expression, for instance by occluding the target sites required for binding by the cleavage and polyadenylation protein complex, minimum folding energies for the synthetic 3′-UTR library components were calculated using the RNAfold software ( 31 ). Only a weak-to-moderate positive correlation between folding propensity and reporter expression was found (Pearson's r = 0.34, P -value < 0.005) ( Supplementary Figure S5 ), indicating that while weak RNA structure in the 3′-UTR and polyadenylation sequence may to a certain extent favor expression ( 50 ), other factors are likely to be implicated in determining final expression levels, including, for instance, the impact of the 3′-UTR sequences on overall mRNA stability and half-life ( 51 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%