2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Fabrication of a Satellite Communication Dielectric Resonator Antenna with Novel Low Loss and Temperature-Stabilized (Sm1–xCax) (Nb1–xMox)O4 (x = 0.15–0.7) Microwave Ceramics

Abstract: Phase transition−structure−dielectric properties in microwave band correlations were determined for the (Sm 1−x Ca x ) (Nb 1−x Mo x )O 4 (SNCMo@x) system. X-ray and Raman analyses along with selected-area electron diffraction indicated that SNCMo@x (0.15 ≤ x < 0.375) ceramics crystallize in the I2/a space group (monoclinic fergusonite), whereas the I4 1 /a space group (tetragonal scheelite) best describes SNCMo@x (0.375 ≤ x ≤ 0.7), suggesting that the increased ionic radius of the A-site effectively contribute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the x value increased to 0.3, a pronounced peak split was observed at 330 cm −1 B g (ν 2 ), indicating the phase transition of LnNbO 4 from fergusonite to scheelite. 15 As the x value further increases to 0.35, new Raman modes emerged, including B g (ν 2 ) at 265 cm −1 , B g (ν 3 ) at 800 cm −1 , and A g (ν 1 ) at 880 cm −1 . By comparing with the Raman spectroscopy of LaVO 4 , these additional Raman peaks were attributed to specific vibrational modes of [VO 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When the x value increased to 0.3, a pronounced peak split was observed at 330 cm −1 B g (ν 2 ), indicating the phase transition of LnNbO 4 from fergusonite to scheelite. 15 As the x value further increases to 0.35, new Raman modes emerged, including B g (ν 2 ) at 265 cm −1 , B g (ν 3 ) at 800 cm −1 , and A g (ν 1 ) at 880 cm −1 . By comparing with the Raman spectroscopy of LaVO 4 , these additional Raman peaks were attributed to specific vibrational modes of [VO 4 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most researches before focus on the relationship between tilted structure and restoring force 18,21–23 . As previously reported for the tilted perovskite structure, the increased thermal energy is supposed to be absorbed as the tilting recovers and it may contribute less to the restoring force on the ionic polarization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researches before focus on the relationship between tilted structure and restoring force. 18,[21][22][23] As previously reported for the tilted perovskite structure, the increased thermal energy is supposed to be absorbed as the tilting recovers and it may contribute less to the restoring force on the ionic polarization. In the un-tilted structure, the cation ordering arrangement causes a distortion of Nb 5+ , and subsequently results in three long Nb-O1 bonds and three short Nb-O2 bonds (see Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the proximity of the intrinsic frequencies of phonons (ranging from 10 11 to 10 12 Hz) in ceramic crystals to the far‐infrared frequency range, it is convenient to consider that the intrinsic dielectric loss of ceramic samples is predominantly caused by non‐harmonic vibrations of phonons when tested in the far‐infrared frequency range. By measuring the infrared reflectance (IR) spectra of ceramic samples and employing classical dispersion theory and a three‐parameter model, the contribution of lattice vibrations to the dielectric constant and intrinsic dielectric loss of the ceramics can be determined through extrapolation using the Reffit software 31,32 εfalse(ω)=ε+normalj0.28em=0.28em1nωpi2ωoj2ω2+jωγj$$\begin{equation}{\varepsilon ^*}{\mathrm{(}}\omega {\mathrm{)\; = \;}}{\varepsilon _\infty }{\mathrm{\; + \;}}\mathop \sum \limits_{{\mathrm{j\; = \;1}}}^{\mathrm{n}} \frac{{\omega _{{\mathrm{pi}}}^{\mathrm{2}}}}{{\omega _{{\mathrm{oj}}}^{\mathrm{2}} - {\omega ^{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{\; + \;}}j\omega {\gamma _{\mathrm{j}}}}}\end{equation}$$ R=1ε()ω1+ε()ω2$$\begin{equation}R{\mathrm{\; = \;}}{\left| {\frac{{{\mathrm{1}} - \sqrt {{\varepsilon ^*}\left( \omega \right)} }}{{{\mathrm{1\; + \;}}\sqrt {{\varepsilon ^*}\left( \omega \right)} }}} \right|^{\mathrm{2}}}\end{equation}$$ tanδbadbreak=0.28emεε0.28emgoodbreak=0.28emnormalj0.28em=0.28em10.28emnormalnnormalΔεj()γjω0.28em/0.28emωoj2…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By measuring the infrared reflectance (IR) spectra of ceramic samples and employing classical dispersion theory and a three-parameter model, the contribution of lattice vibrations to the dielectric constant and intrinsic dielectric loss of the ceramics can be determined through extrapolation using the Reffit software. 31,32…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%