1995
DOI: 10.1049/ip-cdt:19952157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and hardware architectures for dynamic Huffman coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 MHz. An adaptive Huffman code implementation in hardware is presented in [26]. This design is based on content addressable memory (CAM) modules to speed up the tree adaptation process and achieves a throughput of almost 1 bit/cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 MHz. An adaptive Huffman code implementation in hardware is presented in [26]. This design is based on content addressable memory (CAM) modules to speed up the tree adaptation process and achieves a throughput of almost 1 bit/cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data is stored securely, as all selected compression codecs are lossless. The gzip and deflate codecs use the deflate algorithm as a combination of lz77 and Huffman Coding [10]. The lz77 compression algorithm replaces duplicate bit positions regarding their previous positions.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, each symbol at a leaf node is assigned a weight that depends on the relative frequency of the symbol within the source message, and each non-leaf node contains a weight value that is the sum of all the weights of the leaves lying below it. Current Huffman coding methods employ the symbol weights for constructing the Huffman tree, which requires considerable computation time for determining the relative position of each symbol on the tree [6,7]. Therefore, the present work employs the data structure elements proposed in the previous section to construct the Huffman tree, which simplifies the complexity of the construction process by synchronously construct- Fig.…”
Section: Encoding Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%