2012
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2012.121104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Implementation of an Underlay Control Channel for Cognitive Radios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current literature pertaining to FBMC-SS utilizes the output of the matched filter for packet detection and timing acquisition only. The task of information recovery is then performed via an AFB, as noted above, a maximum ratio combiner (MRC), [6], and possibly a RAKE receiver [13].…”
Section: Normalized Matched Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current literature pertaining to FBMC-SS utilizes the output of the matched filter for packet detection and timing acquisition only. The task of information recovery is then performed via an AFB, as noted above, a maximum ratio combiner (MRC), [6], and possibly a RAKE receiver [13].…”
Section: Normalized Matched Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, our team has revisited filter bank multicarrier spread spectrum (FBMC-SS) systems and explored their implementation details, [6]. In this implementation, each data packet comes with a known preamble which is used to extract the relevant channel state information (CSI), including the interference level at different subcarrier bands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, consider the case where the four terminals are located in an area where a large number of cells have been deployed by different operators for the local coverage enhancement of a potentially crowded zone interested in opportunistic multimedia downloads at low cost. Each relay is provided of a proper backhaul connection and cooperates with the other relays (and with the terminals) by means of a control channel, designed in dedicated, common, or underlay fashion [25]. The cooperation is aimed at determining according to an optimization procedure (e.g., that proposed in [26]), the subcarriers available for the transmission of each active terminal, and its transmitted power (to be minimized).…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Two Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out-of-band designs call for a dedicated narrowband channel that is used to transmit the control signals [5], [8], while in-band designs typically involve a UCC spanning the full bandwidth [6], [7], [12]. While a dedicated narrowband control channel is straightforward to implement and provides higher reliability, setting aside a dedicated narrowband chunk of spectrum may not always be feasible, or sometimes even unnecessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a dedicated narrowband control channel is straightforward to implement and provides higher reliability, setting aside a dedicated narrowband chunk of spectrum may not always be feasible, or sometimes even unnecessary. In-band designs typically propose to use spread spectrum techniques to implement a low-power UCC spanning the entire bandwidth with or without considerations for the primary transmissions [6], [7]. Although such a design is exposed to the primary and secondary transmissions, it involves no spectrum overhead and is well-suited for a low-data-rate communication channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%