2014
DOI: 10.12700/aph.25.04.2014.04.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Implementation of Differential Evolution Algorithm on FPGA for Double-Precision Floating-Point Representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tanabe and Fukunaga(Tanabe & Fukunaga, 2014) developed an adaptation of DE using linear population size reduction that decreases the population size gradually using linear function. Cortés-Antonio et al(2014) presents the results of implementation of differential evolution algorithm on a field programmable gate array device (FPGA) using floating point representation with double precision.Ali Wagdy Mohamed (Ali Wagdy Mohamed, 2015) introduced a triangular mutation rule based on convex combination vector.Wu et al (Wu et al, 2016)introduced a multi-population-based structure to identify an adapted collection of threemutation strategies. The population is dynamically dividedinto severalsub-populations includingone reward sub-population and three indicator sub-populations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tanabe and Fukunaga(Tanabe & Fukunaga, 2014) developed an adaptation of DE using linear population size reduction that decreases the population size gradually using linear function. Cortés-Antonio et al(2014) presents the results of implementation of differential evolution algorithm on a field programmable gate array device (FPGA) using floating point representation with double precision.Ali Wagdy Mohamed (Ali Wagdy Mohamed, 2015) introduced a triangular mutation rule based on convex combination vector.Wu et al (Wu et al, 2016)introduced a multi-population-based structure to identify an adapted collection of threemutation strategies. The population is dynamically dividedinto severalsub-populations includingone reward sub-population and three indicator sub-populations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows the percentage of publications of the modifications of the parameters of the algorithm. Qin, Huang, and Suganthan(2008) Vector generation control parameters Das et al(2009) Vector generation Mutation functions Gong et al (Gong et al, 2010) Learning procedures Brest and Maucec(Brest & Maučec, 2011) Learning procedures Mallipeddi et al(2011) Mutation functions control parameters Vector generation Wang, Cai, and Zhang(2011) Learning procedures Vector generation control parameters L. Wang et al (2012) Learning procedures Caraffini et al(2013) Learning procedures Tanabe and Fukunaga(2013) control parameters Tanabe and Fukunaga (Tanabe & Fukunaga, 2014) Population Author Modifications Cortés-Antonio et al(2014) Learning procedures Ali Wagdy Mohamed (Ali Wagdy Mohamed, 2015) Mutation functions Wu et al (Wu et al, 2016)…”
Section: The Modifications Of the Parameters Of Dementioning
confidence: 99%