2017 2nd International Conferences on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icitisee.2017.8285493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and implementation of flood detector using wireless sensor network with mamdani's fuzzy logic method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A WSN is generally configured towards a specific use case, which sometimes can result in a lack of flexibility in terms of applications. One example of a novel application of WSN is a flood detector system [22], where the authors employ a multi-hop WSN consisting of ultrasonic and water flow sensors to monitor the water levels. A mamdani fuzzy logic system is proposed to process the sensor readings and output flood warnings, with a 96.96% accuracy achieved experimentally.…”
Section: Wireless Sensor Network Vs Virtual Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A WSN is generally configured towards a specific use case, which sometimes can result in a lack of flexibility in terms of applications. One example of a novel application of WSN is a flood detector system [22], where the authors employ a multi-hop WSN consisting of ultrasonic and water flow sensors to monitor the water levels. A mamdani fuzzy logic system is proposed to process the sensor readings and output flood warnings, with a 96.96% accuracy achieved experimentally.…”
Section: Wireless Sensor Network Vs Virtual Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study also utilised the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) algorithm for the autonomous monitoring of flood. In a similar approach, Pratama et al [43] utilised Mamdani fuzzy logic along with ZigBee and water level sensors to detect and transmit the flood-related data. The study suggests that the maximum error for the proposed approach falls within an acceptable range of five percent.…”
Section: Computer Vision and Iot Sensors For Early Warning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work [17] compares SMAC, TMAC and 802.11 in terms of energy consumption and the results show that TMAC saves 25% more energy than SMAC. In another project [18], the same protocols are compared, however, more performance metrics are looked into such as end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio and throughput and similarly, TMAC does better than SMAC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%