2017
DOI: 10.2316/journal.206.2017.2.206-4572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Implementation of Thunniform Robotic Fish With Variable Body Stiffness

Abstract: In nature, undulatory swimmers consume minimum energy by adjusting their body's natural frequency to match the tail-beat frequency. Inspired by this, we study the dynamic model of fish body by considering the body shape and the fluid interactions, and develop a soft thunniform robotic fish. The experimental results show that when the driving frequency is close to the natural frequency, the speed of robotic fish reaches the maximum value, approximately 0.25 body length per second. Moreover, an empty space with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study by Xie et al [18], the performance of a caudal fin with medium stiffness was the best, and a similar conclusion was reached in [19]. In [20], the stiffness of the robotic fish was adjusted by varying the air pressure on the fish body so that the natural frequency could range from 2.0 to 2.8 Hz. The robotic fish developed by Li et al [21] contained an active joint and a passive joint composed of a torsion spring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study by Xie et al [18], the performance of a caudal fin with medium stiffness was the best, and a similar conclusion was reached in [19]. In [20], the stiffness of the robotic fish was adjusted by varying the air pressure on the fish body so that the natural frequency could range from 2.0 to 2.8 Hz. The robotic fish developed by Li et al [21] contained an active joint and a passive joint composed of a torsion spring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Compared with a rigid fin, a robotic fish propelled by a flexible caudal fin can perform the undulation curve of natural fish better. However, the kinematics and control of a fully flexible fin are more complex [18,20], and changing the stiffness requires making a new tail. Several studies have used passive flexible joints to connect rigid fins to realize propulsion [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The materials used for soft robot fabrication include polymers [2, 3], elastomers [4], hydrogels [5, 6], and granules [7]. The model of actuation is another key factor for a soft robot, such as pneumatic [8, 9], electrical [10], or chemical [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%