Earth &Amp;amp; Space 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1061/40830(188)91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Mobility Evaluation of a Crawler-Type Lunar Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nano-rovers may not be independent in operation, but are powered by the Lander through tethers. 10 Findings and results…”
Section: Soil Interactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nano-rovers may not be independent in operation, but are powered by the Lander through tethers. 10 Findings and results…”
Section: Soil Interactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is extremely complex to integrate all the miniaturized components. The components require slow, delicate and careful handling.The Advanced Space Technology research group of JAXA proposes a tracker for SELENE-I1 lunar mission[10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main disadvantages of a tracked vehicle are weight and a large number of parts that could cause a breakdown if they were to fail. As ordinary crawler links using pins and bushes are heavy and have many potential breakdown points, a new crawler link design was needed [11].…”
Section: Design Of Crawler Linkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Advanced Space Technology research group in JAXA proposes a tracker for SELENE-II lunar mission (Wakabayashi et al, 2006). The mobility system for this tracker consists of four caterpillar crawl units with two on both sides (Fig.…”
Section: Four-track Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%