32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1996
DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-2732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and operation of a laboratory benchmark PPT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continuous decrease in voltage peak with pressure over a wide range proposes that Paschen's law does not apply here. The design of the PPT has been accomplished in a way to provide a basis for comparison of the performance results with earlier models by Benson and Arrington (1999), Kamhawi et al (1996), Pottinger and Scharlemann (2007) and Vondra and Thomassen (1974). The PPTwas tested at discharge energies of 54, 39.3, 27.3, 17.5, 9.8, 4.3, 1.09, and 0.7 J.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The continuous decrease in voltage peak with pressure over a wide range proposes that Paschen's law does not apply here. The design of the PPT has been accomplished in a way to provide a basis for comparison of the performance results with earlier models by Benson and Arrington (1999), Kamhawi et al (1996), Pottinger and Scharlemann (2007) and Vondra and Thomassen (1974). The PPTwas tested at discharge energies of 54, 39.3, 27.3, 17.5, 9.8, 4.3, 1.09, and 0.7 J.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the effect of discharge energy on PPT performance has been studied by Benson and Arrington (1999), Kamhawi et al (1996), Pottinger and Scharlemann (2007) and Rezaeiha et al (2011a). The effect of frequency on PPT performance has been studied by Antropov et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the studies unanimously report a quite linear relationship between discharge energy and impulse bit, and discharge energy and specific impulse. Although performance parameters presented in Pottinger and Scharlemann (2007) and Rezaeiha et al (2011a, b) were calculated from empirical relations and indirect measurement of thrust but the trend observed by them shows a reasonable compliance with the trend derived from direct measurement of thrust and performance parameters measured by Guman and Peko (1968), Kamhawi et al (1996) and Benson and Arrington (1999). Table IX presents the variations of impulse bit, specific impulse, mass bit per discharge, thruster efficiency, and exhaust velocity as a function of discharge energy (Rezaeiha et al, 2011a, b).…”
Section: Discharge Energymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, discharge energy is the best parameter to be changed and adjusted, when a multi-mode PPT with different levels of thrust is to be designed. Numerous studies have been done to clarify the effect of discharge energy on PPT performance including Guman and Peko (1968) at Fairchild Industries, Kamhawi et al (1996) at Ohio State University, Benson and Arrington (1999) at GRC, Pottinger and Scharlemann (2007) at ARC, Nawaz (2010) at IRS, Shaw(2011)atSurreySpaceCenter,andRezaeihaetal. (2011a at Sharif University of Technology.…”
Section: Discharge Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interest stems from the ability of the PPT to operate at very low power levels, even at input powers of less than 10 W, while having low mass and size compared to other propulsion systems. 2) The many other benefits of PPTs listed below are also very persuasive for designers: 3) 1) Zero warm-up time, zero standby power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%