2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and optimization of a novel six-axis force/torque sensor for space robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interference error less than 2.85% was reported from the experimental measurements. Sun et al [7] designed and optimized a novel six-axis force/torque sensor for a space robot. They proposed a novel sensing structure with the through-hole beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interference error less than 2.85% was reported from the experimental measurements. Sun et al [7] designed and optimized a novel six-axis force/torque sensor for a space robot. They proposed a novel sensing structure with the through-hole beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As high as 28% of cross-talk was reported in [157]. In [158,159] along the z-axis which also conrms the previously stated theoretical predictions.…”
Section: The Eect Of Cross-talk On Sensor Performancesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As many as 32 strain gauges were cemented on the body structure of sensors in [159,196,201], resulting in larger amounts of data being transmitted. In an attempt to reduce the online communication bandwidth and number of wires out of the sensor, researchers used electronic components such as an internal microcontroller to group the sensing elements and pre-process data locally inside the sensor unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early on, the strain gauge balance design including automated shape optimization [13] was primarily based on classical hand calculations or experiments until in the 1990s, the Finite Element Method (FEM) was exploited thoroughly in the structural optimization [14], [15]. Later, the design of experiments (DOE) methodology, the response surface methodology (RSM) or other optimization algorithms combined with FEM analysis were proposed to efficiently explore the design variables in the multidimensional design space in order to rely lightly on the experience and intuition of the balance designer [16]- [18]. Currently, most balance designers still prefer to obtain a balance by CAD and CAE tools, respectively [19]- [24], because of the discrete knowledge and computational support tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%