2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and performance evaluation of a novel system integrating Water-based carbon capture with adiabatic compressed air energy storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In instances where water served as the adsorption fluid, thermodynamic analysis of the CO 2rich air indicated that the mass flow of circulating water necessary for CO 2 absorption surpasses that of flue gas by over 25 times, despite the reduced CO 2 partial pressure. 6 This investigation also unveiled that the energy consumption for CO 2 capture stood at ∼350 kWh/t-CO 2 , marking a 60−70% reduction compared to amine-based capture technologies requiring ∼1000 kWh/t-CO 2 . 7 Selectivity and adsorption capacity are crucial performance metrics.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In instances where water served as the adsorption fluid, thermodynamic analysis of the CO 2rich air indicated that the mass flow of circulating water necessary for CO 2 absorption surpasses that of flue gas by over 25 times, despite the reduced CO 2 partial pressure. 6 This investigation also unveiled that the energy consumption for CO 2 capture stood at ∼350 kWh/t-CO 2 , marking a 60−70% reduction compared to amine-based capture technologies requiring ∼1000 kWh/t-CO 2 . 7 Selectivity and adsorption capacity are crucial performance metrics.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In water-based CO 2 capture methods, the volume of water required for CO 2 capture under ambient pressure is notably higher due to the lower CO 2 partial pressure. In instances where water served as the adsorption fluid, thermodynamic analysis of the CO 2 -rich air indicated that the mass flow of circulating water necessary for CO 2 absorption surpasses that of flue gas by over 25 times, despite the reduced CO 2 partial pressure . This investigation also unveiled that the energy consumption for CO 2 capture stood at ∼350 kWh/t-CO 2 , marking a 60–70% reduction compared to amine-based capture technologies requiring ∼1000 kWh/t-CO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ref. [26] designed a system integrating water‐based carbon capture with an adiabatic compressed air energy storage system to reduce the energy consumption of water‐based carbon capture technology. The operation of a power plant with CCS is modelled as multi‐period stochastic programming to maximize the daily profit, which is solved by approximate dynamic programming [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%