2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and performance evaluation of an amphibious spherical robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the maximum velocity (8.5 cm/s) of the previous robot [37], the maximum velocity of TTWG was about twice higher. For the rotatory gait, the maximum rotatory velocity in previous robot [38] was up to 67°/s while the weight of the robot was only 2.1 KG. However, Now ASR-III's weight was up to 8.2 KG (about four times heavier than the previous robot), and the rotatory velocity was 44.5°/s (decline 33.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the maximum velocity (8.5 cm/s) of the previous robot [37], the maximum velocity of TTWG was about twice higher. For the rotatory gait, the maximum rotatory velocity in previous robot [38] was up to 67°/s while the weight of the robot was only 2.1 KG. However, Now ASR-III's weight was up to 8.2 KG (about four times heavier than the previous robot), and the rotatory velocity was 44.5°/s (decline 33.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing to 3R-SRs, similar steps should be taken in order to derive kinematics equation of 2R-SRs. The only distinction is that, in 2R-SRs, the robot is not capable of rotating about its vertical axis, i.e., it is assumed that 0    , therefore we can write: 11 12 x a R a R        , 21 22 31 32…”
Section: ) Triple-axis Rolling Spherical Robot (3r-sr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, while several researches have been done on 3D kinematics of other types of mobile robots such as legged [14] and wheeled robots [15,16], to the best of the authors' knowledge, the general problem of kinematics of SRs rolling on 3D terrains has not been investigated in the literature. The motivation to address this problem is that, while many applications of the SRs are on flat surfaces such as indoor [17], and paved roads [18], for a variety of applications such as agriculture [19], surveillance [20], environmental monitoring [21], and even planetary explorations [22], they would get exposed to uneven terrains.In this work, prior to deriving the kinematics of SRs on 3D terrains, a general method for modeling a geometrical sphere rolling over a mathematically known 3D surface is developed. Then, the derived equations are expanded in order to be applied to SRs considering their specifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When in water, the robot moved using the drag-based swimming. The mechanism proposed by Li, et al [17], is not feasible for the proposed model since the spherical robot has two different mechanisms for locomotion. The swimming mechanism of the robot designed by Dhull, et al [18] Dudek, et al [19], and by Liang, et al [20] were somewhat similar compared to the robot developed in this paper.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%