Design And Performance Of Cemcap Cement Plant Without Co2 Capture (D4.1)

Campanari, Stefano; Cinti, Giovanni; Consonni, Stefano; Fleiger, Kristina; Gatti, Manuele; Hoppe, Helmut; Martínez, Isabel Casabona; Romano, Matteo Carmelo; Spinelli, Maurizio; Voldsund, Mari

doi:10.5281/zenodo.1001664

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The reference cement plant without CO2 capture relies on the Best Available Technique (BAT) standard as defined in the European BREF-Document (Best Available Technique Reference) for the manufacture of cement [21] based on dry process configuration with a clinker production of about 3000 tpd. For a more accurate description the reader is addressed to the following articles [2,7].…”

Section: Reference Cement Plantmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the carbon capture technologies analysed and proposed so far are based on oxyfuel and post-combustion processes. A state-of-the-art cement plant has a specific CO2 emission per ton of clinker produced of about 865 kgCO2/tclk [2], about 60% of which is associated with the calcination reaction (CaCO3CaO+CO2). The CaO generated in the calcination process reacts with the other components of the raw meal, such as silica and alumina, to generate the constituents of clinker [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A state-of-the-art cement plant has a specific CO2 emission per ton of clinker produced of about 865 kgCO2/tclk [2], about 60% of which is associated with the calcination reaction (CaCO3CaO+CO2). The CaO generated in the calcination process reacts with the other components of the raw meal, such as silica and alumina, to generate the constituents of clinker [2]. In a modern cement plant, about 90% of the calcination process takes place in a precalciner, while main clinker constituents are formed in the rotary kiln.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative Analysis of the Oxyfuel and Calcium Looping Processes for Low-Carbon Cement Production

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Reference Cement Plantmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Analysis of the Oxyfuel and Calcium Looping Processes for Low-Carbon Cement Production

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 1: Technical Evaluation

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A technical evaluation of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant is performed. The investigated technologies are the oxyfuel process, the chilled ammonia process, membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and the calcium looping process with tail-end and integrated configurations. For comparison, absorption with monoethanolamine (MEA) is used as reference technology. The focus of the evaluation is on emission abatement, energy performance, and retrofitability. All the investigated technologies perform better than the reference both in terms of emission abatement and energy consumption. The equivalent CO2 avoided are 73–90%, while it is 64% for MEA, considering the average EU-28 electricity mix. The specific primary energy consumption for CO2 avoided is 1.63–4.07 MJ/kg CO2, compared to 7.08 MJ/kg CO2 for MEA. The calcium looping technologies have the highest emission abatement potential, while the oxyfuel process has the best energy performance. When it comes to retrofitability, the post-combustion technologies show significant advantages compared to the oxyfuel and to the integrated calcium looping technologies. Furthermore, the performance of the individual technologies shows strong dependencies on site-specific and plant-specific factors. Therefore, rather than identifying one single best technology, it is emphasized that CO2 capture in the cement industry should be performed with a portfolio of capture technologies, where the preferred choice for each specific plant depends on local factors.

show abstract

Design And Performance Of Cemcap Cement Plant Without Co2 Capture (D4.1)

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Comparative Analysis of the Oxyfuel and Calcium Looping Processes for Low-Carbon Cement Production

Comparative Analysis of the Oxyfuel and Calcium Looping Processes for Low-Carbon Cement Production

Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 1: Technical Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About