2021
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202102148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Qualification of Pr–Fe–Cu–B Alloys for the Additive Manufacturing of Permanent Magnets

Abstract: The direct use of an advanced binder‐free additive manufacturing technique, namely laser powder bed fusion (L‐PBF), does not easily allow obtaining variously shaped, fully dense Nd–Fe–B magnets with high coercivity. The process inherently leads to the re‐melting of the powder and appearance/disappearance of undesired/desired microstructural features responsible for low and large coercivity. In this work, the development of a useful microstructure responsible for high coercivity in Pr21Fe73.5Cu2B3.5 and Nd21Fe7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of L-PBF, the axis in the build direction has the highest cooling rate The magnetic properties obtained for annealed BMC material are in good agreement with the magnetic properties obtained in the literature for cast material [16,17]. The brief trial of laser melting a few powder layers of Fe73.5-Pr21.0-Cu2.0-B3.5 as reported in [26] resulted in a coercive field of 0.75 T and remanence of 38 Am/kg. Assuming a density of 7.4 g/cm 3 , the remanence value is equivalent to 0.35 T.…”
Section: Comparison Between Fe-pr-cu-b-based Printed Parts and Bmc Materialssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of L-PBF, the axis in the build direction has the highest cooling rate The magnetic properties obtained for annealed BMC material are in good agreement with the magnetic properties obtained in the literature for cast material [16,17]. The brief trial of laser melting a few powder layers of Fe73.5-Pr21.0-Cu2.0-B3.5 as reported in [26] resulted in a coercive field of 0.75 T and remanence of 38 Am/kg. Assuming a density of 7.4 g/cm 3 , the remanence value is equivalent to 0.35 T.…”
Section: Comparison Between Fe-pr-cu-b-based Printed Parts and Bmc Materialssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The best magnetic properties reported so far for as-cast material were obtained for the chemical composition Fe73.8-Pr20.5-Cu2.0-B3.7 and two-step heat treatment (step 1: 1000 • C/5 h; step 2: 500 • C/3 h) yielding J r = 0.62 T, µ 0 H c = 1.13 T and (BH) max = 70.0 kJ/m 3 [17]. Recently, limited trials of laser melting for a few powder layers of a similar composition (Fe73.5-Pr21.0-Cu2.0-B3.5) resulted in very small samples showing a remanence of J r = 38 Am/kg and a coercive field of µ 0 H c = 0.75 T [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general possibility of obtaining the anisotropy of magnetic properties of printed magnets via the formation of a temperature gradient was shown in [17]. An original approach to fast searching for the compositions for the 3D printing and estimation of potential magnetic properties was given in [18]. In recent years, there is a direction of studies related to the formation of microstructural peculiarities [19] and cracks in magnets [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure must allow reaching the highest possible coercivity and remanent induction and a magnetization loop close to a rectangular one. The achievement of each of these objectives is facilitated by the existence of a granular microstructure [ 2 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%