2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and rationale of a randomized trial: Using short stay units instead of routine admission to improve patient centered health outcomes for acute heart failure patients (SSU-AHF)

Abstract: Nearly 85% of acute heart failure (AHF) patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute heart failure are hospitalized. Once hospitalized, within 30 days post-discharge, 27% of patients are re-hospitalized or die. Attempts to improve outcomes with novel therapies have all failed. The evidence for existing AHF therapies are poor: No currently used AHF treatment is known to improve long-term outcomes. ED treatment is largely the same today as 40 years ago. Admitting patients who could have avoid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Several alternatives to hospital admission have been studied and adopted, including the use of observation units, hospital at-home programs, and dedicated care transition clinics. 6,55,56 Improved care navigation and monitoring might, in some cases, allow ED providers and patients to opt for outpatient management rather than hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Several alternatives to hospital admission have been studied and adopted, including the use of observation units, hospital at-home programs, and dedicated care transition clinics. 6,55,56 Improved care navigation and monitoring might, in some cases, allow ED providers and patients to opt for outpatient management rather than hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute heart failure (AHF) accounts for 1 million emergency department (ED) visits annually 1 and presents significant dilemmas for risk stratification and ED disposition 2 . Over 80% of AHF patients treated in United States EDs are admitted to the hospital, but as many as half may be low enough risk to avoid admission 3–6 . The forthcoming 2022 update to the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) clinical policy on AHF 7 identified three validated clinical decision instruments (CDI) 8–10 that are useful for risk‐stratification: the STRATIFY risk score, 8,11 the Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG), 9,12 and the Ottawa Heart Failure Risk Scale (OHFRS) 10,13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 Over 80% of AHF patients treated in United States EDs are admitted to the hospital, but as many as half may be low enough risk to avoid admission. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 The forthcoming 2022 update to the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) clinical policy on AHF 7 identified three validated clinical decision instruments (CDI) 8 , 9 , 10 that are useful for risk‐stratification: the STRATIFY risk score, 8 , 11 the Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG), 9 , 12 and the Ottawa Heart Failure Risk Scale (OHFRS). 10 , 13 While all three have validation test characteristics that exceed published performance of emergency physician (EP)‐estimated risk 9 and actual disposition decisions, 12 none were deemed sufficient to direct AHF disposition on their own.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the cardiology patients admitted at SSU, 57% were discharged from SSU and had low average LOS and mortality, which are characteristics expected to typical SSU patients. [8][9][10]21 (35%) and ICU (8%), respectively. This transfer rate to the conventional ward is higher than that reported for alternative SSUs, which has been <10%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%