2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.11.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and synthesis of a novel, achiral class of highly potent and selective, orally active neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NTP, a selective and potent NK-1 receptor antagonist (Hoffmann et al, 2006), suppressed these effects of Sar-Met-SP. The results suggest that NK-1 receptors in sensory nerves, in addition to those at other sites such as the spinal cord and bladder smooth muscle may play an important role in the generation of overactive bladder and that block of these receptors may contribute to efficacy of NK-1 antagonists in the treatment of OAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…NTP, a selective and potent NK-1 receptor antagonist (Hoffmann et al, 2006), suppressed these effects of Sar-Met-SP. The results suggest that NK-1 receptors in sensory nerves, in addition to those at other sites such as the spinal cord and bladder smooth muscle may play an important role in the generation of overactive bladder and that block of these receptors may contribute to efficacy of NK-1 antagonists in the treatment of OAB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…NTP, which is a selective and potent NK-1 receptor antagonist with an EC 50 of approximately 10 nM (Hoffmann et al, 2006;Campi et al, 2010;Palea et al, 2010a,b), was tested at 200 and 500 nM concentrations. In bladder smooth muscle preparations, NTP in concentrations between 10 and 100 nM selectively suppresses the contractions evoked by an NK-1 agonist, but a high concentration (1 M) reduces the responses evoked by carbachol or KCl (Palea et al, 2010a,b).…”
Section: Nk-1 Receptors In Guinea Pig Drg Neurons 47mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the relevance of SP‐NK1 signaling in cancer, substantial efforts have been made to develop therapeutic inhibitors against NK1 (Huang and Korlipara, 2010; Munoz et al, 2011). Despite their promising results in model systems none of them has been shown to have potent antitumor activity in clinical trials (Humphrey, 2003; Hoffmann et al, 2006; Quartara and Altamura, 2006). Thus, we decided to target SP instead of its receptor and, given the lack of chemical compounds capable to inhibiting this small peptide, we used antibodies to address the therapeutic potential of SP inhibition in cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of these antagonists is limited in in vivo studies for the following reasons: their inability to gain access to the central nervous system through the blood-brain barrier, their neurotoxicity after administration in the central nervous system, their mast cell degranulation activity, their affinity is several orders of magnitude lower than that of natural agonists, their partial residual agonist activity, their metabolic instability, and their poor potency and ability to discriminate between tachykinin receptors. In the last two decades, nonpeptide based NK 1 receptor antagonists have been subjects of interest in many pharmaceutical companies, as reported in the literature [47][48][49][50]. An overview of the most wellknown NK 1 nonpeptide antagonists in the pharmaceutical scenario is reported in Table 17.1.…”
Section: Neurokinin 1 Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%