1995
DOI: 10.1021/jm00012a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Synthesis of New Naphthalenic Derivatives as Ligands for 2-[125I]Iodomelatonin Binding Sites

Abstract: New melatonin-like agents were designed from the frameworks of 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine, an important structural moiety for the 5-HT receptor, and (2-methoxynaphthyl)-ethylamine. The compounds were synthesized by classical methods and evaluated in binding assays with chicken brain membranes using 2-[125I]iodomelatonin as the radioligand. Preliminary studies on the series of N-acyl-disubstituted phenethylamines showed the favorable role of the methoxy group in the ortho position of the side chain on the affi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
54
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 5-position on the indole ring is optimal for the methoxy group, because moving it to position 4, 6, or 7 leads to a dramatic loss of affinity, although compounds with a halogen at the 5-position do retain high affinity (Mor et al, 1998). The relative position of the methoxy group and the N-acetylaminoethyl side chain seems to be an important determinant of affinity (Depreux et al, 1994;Langlois et al, 1995;Garratt et al, 1996). The indole ring is not essential for ligand binding because it can be replaced by various other aromatic systems such as naphthalene, benzofuran, benzothiophene, or benzocycloalkene rings (Depreux et al, 1994;Leclerc et al, 1998;Fukatsu et al, 2002).…”
Section: B Structure-activity Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5-position on the indole ring is optimal for the methoxy group, because moving it to position 4, 6, or 7 leads to a dramatic loss of affinity, although compounds with a halogen at the 5-position do retain high affinity (Mor et al, 1998). The relative position of the methoxy group and the N-acetylaminoethyl side chain seems to be an important determinant of affinity (Depreux et al, 1994;Langlois et al, 1995;Garratt et al, 1996). The indole ring is not essential for ligand binding because it can be replaced by various other aromatic systems such as naphthalene, benzofuran, benzothiophene, or benzocycloalkene rings (Depreux et al, 1994;Leclerc et al, 1998;Fukatsu et al, 2002).…”
Section: B Structure-activity Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, our data suggest that they are acetyl-CoA binding, as well as substratebinding site competitive inhibitors because they occupy the cosubstrate site. As these compounds are broad analogues of melatonin [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], we report their affinities for the MT 1 and/or MT 2 receptors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, what we know is that the indole ring of melatonin is not crucial for melatonin receptor recognition. For instance, the naphthalene ring [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] can serve as a bioisostere of the indole nucleus of melatonin and analog 2 was reported to have equivalent affinity to melatonin for melatonin receptors in ovine pars tuberalis.…”
Section: -7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, what we know is that the indole ring of melatonin is not crucial for melatonin receptor recognition. For instance, the naphthalene ring [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] can serve as a bioisostere of the indole nucleus of melatonin and analog 2 was reported to have equivalent affinity to melatonin for melatonin receptors in ovine pars tuberalis.11) In addition, other groups such as amidotetralin, 21) methoxychroman, 22) amido indane, 23) benzofuran, 18,24) benzothiophene 18,24) and quinoline 25) can serve as a bioisostere of the indole nucleus of melatonin. Langlois et al reported that the addition of a 2-methoxy group (OMe) to compound 2 to form 3 results in an order of magnitude increase in receptor affinity over compound 2 (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation