From a scientific perspective, efforts to understand biology including what constitutes health and disease has become a chemical problem. However, chemists and biologists "see" the problems of understanding biology from different perspectives, and this has retarded progress in solving the problems especially as they relate to health and disease. This suggests that close collaboration between chemists and biologists is not only necessary but essential for progress in both the biology and chemistry that will provide solutions to the global questions of biology. This perspective has directed my scientific efforts for the past 45 years, and in this overview I provide my perspective of how the applications of synthetic chemistry, structural design, and numerous other chemical principles have intersected in my collaborations with biologists to provide new tools, new science, and new insights that were only made possible and fruitful by these collaborations.In the spring of 1965 I made a fateful decision. I decided to change courses in my scientific career from synthetic chemistry and theoretic organic chemistry and accept an offer to join Vincent du Vigneaud's group at Cornell University Medical College as an Instructor in Biochemistry (I had not taken a course in Biochemistry). In doing so I accepted a challenge he had been working on for many years, the structure of acetone oxytocin (an inactive form of oxytocin which contained 1 mol of acetone and 1 mol of oxytocin) using a combination of synthetic/mechanistic organic chemistry and a relatively new structure tool for solving organic structures (in this case a structure of over 1000 Da), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. I loved spectroscopy and mechanistic organic chemistry and thought it would be fun to try. It turned out to be a difficult problem, but fortunately we were successful. 1 Thus began my career in what is now called Chemical Biology. Though both of my Professors, A. T. Blomquist, and V. du Vigneaud, were exceptionally supportive and gave me unparalleled freedom in both my Ph.D. and postdoctoral work, respectively, little did I realize the resistance this field would elicit from chemists. However, du Vigneaud, certainly
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript the most future-looking scientist I have known, and the father of modern Chemical Biology in peptide and protein chemistry, provided all the incentives I have needed. "Victor, we just keep at it, eventually they will catch on." I also learned that collaboration with biologists and medical doctors, which du Vigneaud had been doing for many years, was essential. This is one of the main reasons I chose The University of Arizona to begin my independent science career: the Medical School is less than a mile from the Chemistry Department. That, and the presence of Carl "Speed" Marvel, one of the giants of organic chemistry and the father of polymer chemistry, who wanted me to come to the University of Arizona and was my strongest advocate.Indeed, I have a...