Proceedings of the Workshop on Kernel-Bypass Networks 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3098583.3098592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Challenges for High Performance, Scalable NFV Interconnects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scalability: Software-based IDSes incur high computational costs and often do not scale well (unlike specialized hardware appliances) to handle high traffic rates cost-effectively [165]. Ineffective design of software components can make this problem even worse [88]. Therefore, signature-based IDSes running software platforms are mostly used by relatively smaller enterprises with low traffic rates.…”
Section: B Community Signature-based Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalability: Software-based IDSes incur high computational costs and often do not scale well (unlike specialized hardware appliances) to handle high traffic rates cost-effectively [165]. Ineffective design of software components can make this problem even worse [88]. Therefore, signature-based IDSes running software platforms are mostly used by relatively smaller enterprises with low traffic rates.…”
Section: B Community Signature-based Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was performed by deploying Virtual Machines (VMs), which implements two different VNFs: Open virtual switch (OVS) [24,25] and Snort [25,26]. OVS is an open source implementation of SDN multilayer switch, while Snort is a network anomaly detection and prevention system, which can analyze the traffic.…”
Section: Virtual Network Functions Vnfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, software-based network functions running on virtual machines and containers hosted in commodity servers seem to be the best option to provide high flexibility to create network functions whenever and wherever needed. However, the performance of such network functions in terms of instantiation time, processing capacity and latency as well isolation between their running environments (i.e., containers or virtual machines) still not high enough to be deployed in production environments [47], [48], [49], [50], [51]. This brings the need to further investigate server virtualization technologies, Linux kernel network, the I/O and CPU schedulers, and the inter-VM communication in order to maximize the packet processing capacity and the speed of the containers and virtual machines.…”
Section: F High-performance Virtual Network Functions and Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%