eCM 2012
DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v023a22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, characterisation and in vivo testing of a new, adjustable stiffness, external fixator for the rat femur

Abstract: Very little is known about the infl uence of the mechanical environment on the healing of large segmental defects. This partly refl ects the lack of standardised, well characterised technologies to enable such studies. Here we report the design, construction and characterisation of a novel external fi xator for use in conjunction with rat femoral defects. This device not only imposes a predetermined axial stiffness on the lesion, but also enables the stiffness to be changed during the healing process. The main… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from these studies are not surprising and are consistent with the literature suggesting that extremely rigid fixation is detrimental to bone healing (Chao et al, 1989), and allowing increased flexibility during the later stages of healing is beneficial. Furthermore, this is attributed to the tissues occupying the fracture gap as was demonstrated by both Gardner et al (1996) and Glatt et al (2012a). They demonstrated if there is no material present in the fracture gap, which simulates conditions immediately post-surgery, the fixator frame provided stability at the fracture site with no contribution from the gap itself to support the fracture site.…”
Section: Reverse Dynamizationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Results from these studies are not surprising and are consistent with the literature suggesting that extremely rigid fixation is detrimental to bone healing (Chao et al, 1989), and allowing increased flexibility during the later stages of healing is beneficial. Furthermore, this is attributed to the tissues occupying the fracture gap as was demonstrated by both Gardner et al (1996) and Glatt et al (2012a). They demonstrated if there is no material present in the fracture gap, which simulates conditions immediately post-surgery, the fixator frame provided stability at the fracture site with no contribution from the gap itself to support the fracture site.…”
Section: Reverse Dynamizationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Pilot Study E xternal fixators of three different stiffnesses were constructed as described previously 21 and used in a pilot study to determine their influence on the first two weeks of bone-healing in the presence of BMP-2. This study had two aims: (1) to test our hypothesis that the fixator with the least stiffness would promote the most rapid early healing response and (2) to determine a suitable time for increasing fixator stiffness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defects were stabilized with custom-made external fixators, as described previously 21 . Their key features are interchangeable connection elements of different stiffnesses.…”
Section: Fixatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A PEEK-based external fixator is commercially available for stabilizing rat long bones. This external fixator can be adjusted for stiffness [183]. Therefore, it is very suitable for research questions involving biomechanics in association with drug delivery systems.…”
Section: Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%