2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design charts for eurocode-based design of elastomeric seismic isolation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differently, in case of RU-FREIs, the relatively large shear modulus of the rubber and the limited shear strain (γ=50%), resulted in a slender geometry with an aspect ratio close to 1. Consequently, the use of softer compound with higher deformation capacity allows to design more squat geometry thus preventing instability issues [26]. Lateral stability will be investigated up to complete roll-over of the vertical faces under shear tests.…”
Section: Preliminary Design Of Isolatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently, in case of RU-FREIs, the relatively large shear modulus of the rubber and the limited shear strain (γ=50%), resulted in a slender geometry with an aspect ratio close to 1. Consequently, the use of softer compound with higher deformation capacity allows to design more squat geometry thus preventing instability issues [26]. Lateral stability will be investigated up to complete roll-over of the vertical faces under shear tests.…”
Section: Preliminary Design Of Isolatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained value for unit total mass is Ais=0.00086 m 2 . The diameter of HDNR bearings is defined based on the effective mass to be isolated according to stability criteria and limits on compressive stresses provided by the codes, as illustrated in [34] for the Eurocode. In addition, the number of elastomeric bearings may be lower than the number of columns of the superstructure following as a result of the use of flat sliders (hybrid isolation system) to increase the range of reachable isolation periods.…”
Section: Design Of the Isolation System And Equivalent Linear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To counteract the effect of the earthquake, there are two widely accepted and implemented alternatives. The first consists in isolating the structure at the base, thus reducing the energy input of the earthquake to the building [1][2][3]. While the second one concentrates in mitigating, through auxiliary devices, the energy that has been transmitted by the earthquake to the structure [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%