2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2007.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design charts for the general instability of ring-stiffened conical shells under external hydrostatic pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors advised that further testing is needed to confirm the trends in this study, and to provide a measure of the likely scatter from a larger sample of experimental models (the reason is that in the absence of stiffening rings, buckling of the shell would occur at pressures only a fraction of that required to cause axisymmetric yield of the structure). In 2004, the buckling of three ring-stiffened prolate domes under external hydrostatic pressure was reported by Ross et al [154]. The effect of ring stiffening the domes was to increase their buckling resistance by factors varying from 4.43 to 5.72.…”
Section: (B) Anisotropic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the authors advised that further testing is needed to confirm the trends in this study, and to provide a measure of the likely scatter from a larger sample of experimental models (the reason is that in the absence of stiffening rings, buckling of the shell would occur at pressures only a fraction of that required to cause axisymmetric yield of the structure). In 2004, the buckling of three ring-stiffened prolate domes under external hydrostatic pressure was reported by Ross et al [154]. The effect of ring stiffening the domes was to increase their buckling resistance by factors varying from 4.43 to 5.72.…”
Section: (B) Anisotropic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Shells were made from magnesium or cast-epoxy. Ross [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76] carried out a comprehensive experimental tests of the buckling behavior of ring stiffened thick mild steel cones under external pressure. He proposed a method for calculation of the theoretical elastic buckling pressure for a perfect cone, together with the thinness ratio.…”
Section: Buckling Experiments On Externally Pressurized Conesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the ratio of p exp tl /p numerical varied between 0.62 and 0.80. In a separate research, with scattered results in Refs [88][89][90], a series of 15 mild steel cones reinforced by external rings have been tested under quasi-static external hydrostatic pressure. It is reported that the failures were sudden with a loud bang accompanying failure.…”
Section: Externally Pressurized Conesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous research effort has primarily been limited to buckling by external hydrostatic pressure which in fact corresponds to combined loading due to axial compression resulting from pressure action on top/bottom flanges, e.g., Refs. [86,88,89,91].…”
Section: Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%