2015
DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.04057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Considerations for Clinical Trials of Autonomic Modulation Therapies Targeting Hypertension and Heart Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the promising clinical outcomes observed with surgical denervation, and favorable association between SGB and VA burden, the efficacy and safety of a sympathetic nerve block for VAs have not been tested in randomized prospective trials. Furthermore, the available surgical and percutaneous data cannot exclude a placebo effect as seen with other autonomic modulation procedures such as renal denervation . On one side, the proof of efficacy of the percutanoues SGB could provide an urgently needed alternative therapy for patients at greatest risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; on the other side, continuous use of percutanoues SGB without proven efficacy and safety could result in harm of patients at an already increased risk without any potential benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the promising clinical outcomes observed with surgical denervation, and favorable association between SGB and VA burden, the efficacy and safety of a sympathetic nerve block for VAs have not been tested in randomized prospective trials. Furthermore, the available surgical and percutaneous data cannot exclude a placebo effect as seen with other autonomic modulation procedures such as renal denervation . On one side, the proof of efficacy of the percutanoues SGB could provide an urgently needed alternative therapy for patients at greatest risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; on the other side, continuous use of percutanoues SGB without proven efficacy and safety could result in harm of patients at an already increased risk without any potential benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Importantly, it makes sense to determine the efficacy and short-term safety of a new renal denervation device in a smaller well-characterized sample before it is tested in a larger heterogeneous randomized trial population with increased cardiorenal risk. 6,10 Patients, caregivers, and those assessing BP were blinded to randomization assignments. Blinding of study patients and BP assessors was maintained for up to 12 months after randomization.…”
Section: What Does This Important Study Show?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the multiple measurements obtained with ABP monitoring and removal of observer bias seen in clinical measurements, ABP is more reproducible than clinic measurements and has the ability to determine nocturnal BP values at a time when sympathetic nervous system activity is theoretically lower than while awake. 10,11 SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED was also performed with more than 1 catheter per site, according to international consensus recommendations. 5,6 Results of SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED showed that the renal-denervation group had small but both statistically and clinically significant reductions from baseline to 3 months in both clinic BPs and ABPs, whereas the sham group did not.…”
Section: What Does This Important Study Show?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1) Is SGB more than just an elaborate placebo? The available surgical and percutaneous experience does not exclude a placebo effect as has been seen with other autonomic modulation procedures such as renal denervation . For this and several other reasons, testing SGB in a randomized clinical trial is of paramount importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%