2023
DOI: 10.1115/1.4056653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Considerations for the Attenuation of Translational and Rotational Accelerations in American Football Helmets

Abstract: Participants in American football experience repetitive head impacts that induce negative changes in neurocognitive function over the course of a single season. The current study aimed to quantify the transfer function connecting the force input to the measured output acceleration of the helmet system to provide a comparison of the impact attenuation of various modern American football helmets. Impact mitigation varied considerably between helmet models and with location for each helmet model. The current data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inclusion of a fluid return reservoir may increase the mass of the helmet substantially. Despite this, increased mass has been associated with improved helmet performance in impact testing (McIver et al, 2023), so we do not anticipate that such a modification would have negatively influenced helmet performance. However, it remains unclear how much helmet mass, rather than the physics of the liquid shock absorber, may have contributed to the improved performance of the liquid helmet model relative to the Riddell, Schutt, and Xenith helmet models, which all had lower masses than the liquid helmet.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Inclusion of a fluid return reservoir may increase the mass of the helmet substantially. Despite this, increased mass has been associated with improved helmet performance in impact testing (McIver et al, 2023), so we do not anticipate that such a modification would have negatively influenced helmet performance. However, it remains unclear how much helmet mass, rather than the physics of the liquid shock absorber, may have contributed to the improved performance of the liquid helmet model relative to the Riddell, Schutt, and Xenith helmet models, which all had lower masses than the liquid helmet.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Energy is the typical metric used to classify impact tests and, for helmet testing, is usually between 18 and 150 J (depending on the sport [95]). Where rigid anvils are used for testing, energies may be lower than those expected during actual sporting collisions and falls, with a view to maintaining similar severities, and acceleration vs. time profiles, to the actual collisions and falls [190,227,229]. Wider ranges of impact velocities, energies, and anvil compliances are used in research studies than in standards [85,95,189,229,234].…”
Section: Helmet Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As covered in section 2, there is ongoing discussion around the acceleration magnitudes and time profiles that are associated with clinical diagnosis of concussion, which should be resolved before updating standards [95]. As such, metrics are often compared to in-field measures for actual sporting collisions and falls, and those collected with an un-helmeted headform [190,[226][227][228][229].…”
Section: Helmet Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation