2021
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/012176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design for Disassembly (DfD) in construction industry: a literature mapping and analysis of the existing designs

Abstract: A systematic search of scientific literature on the topic of Design for Disassembly (DfD) in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry was performed with a special focus on study cases. The results were augmented by electronic magazine search due to the non-representative amount of data found in the scientific database. Results show the domination of wood and steel solutions among architects and engineers designing for disassembly. Frame structural system is preferable. DfD structures are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the importance of DfD is well realized, the practical application of the concept has not been fully explored yet. Many studies have stated that the lack of evaluation criteria that allows for weighing the environmental benefits of DfD is the biggest barrier to DfD implementation (Ostapska et al, 2021). In addition, lack of technical knowledge, supporting tools, and time constraints (which favor demolition rather than deconstruction) can also be stated as barriers for DfD (Kanters, 2018).…”
Section: Design For Disassembly and Deconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the importance of DfD is well realized, the practical application of the concept has not been fully explored yet. Many studies have stated that the lack of evaluation criteria that allows for weighing the environmental benefits of DfD is the biggest barrier to DfD implementation (Ostapska et al, 2021). In addition, lack of technical knowledge, supporting tools, and time constraints (which favor demolition rather than deconstruction) can also be stated as barriers for DfD (Kanters, 2018).…”
Section: Design For Disassembly and Deconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DfD implementation of panelized construction has not been studied much, especially regarding timber panels (Yan et al, 2022). Ostapska et al (2021) noted that most of the existing and planned DfD structures use frame (62% of 117) or a combination of frame and modular (15%) as the primary structural system, while only 14% use purely modular systems. However, these buildings mostly used wood or EWP (engineered wood product) (52%), followed by steel or iron (38%).…”
Section: Design For Disassembly and Deconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Redesign at different scales (from furniture to urban) with 'Design for…' principles [20][21]. • Use renewable materials that store carbon and emit few to be produced.…”
Section: Hierarchy Of Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these concepts were not widely utilized in building design worldwide. In the last few years, the attention towards DfD in building design has rapidly increased (Ostapska et al 2021). Authorities, organizations, and companies in the construction sector have studied the concept further, and developed guidelines for DfD (Thormark 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%