2001
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2001.10383093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design for manufacture: A strategy for successful application to buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Design for Assembly (DFA) By adopting DFA guidelines at the design stage, significant reductions in manufacturing cost and improvements in the ease of assembly can be achieved (Fox et al 2001). A few of these guidelines are briefly given here (Boothroyd et al 1994, Poli 2001.…”
Section: Materials and Design Considerations For Rpmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Design for Assembly (DFA) By adopting DFA guidelines at the design stage, significant reductions in manufacturing cost and improvements in the ease of assembly can be achieved (Fox et al 2001). A few of these guidelines are briefly given here (Boothroyd et al 1994, Poli 2001.…”
Section: Materials and Design Considerations For Rpmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A DfMA perspective Design for Manufacturing and Assembly is a discipline stemming from the combination of DfA (Design for Assembly) and DfM (Design for Manufacturing), with the goal of simplifying the product structure to reduce the assembly cost and reducing the total parts cost. DfM provides estimation models of production cost and sensitivity analysis related to the variation of design and process parameters (Fox, Marsh, & Cockerham, 2001); DfA is based on structural models for the estimation of the efficiency of assembly processes and possible improvements (Goulding, Pour Rahimian, Arif, & Sharp, 2015). DfMA was first applied to mechanical industry, but it is nowadays spreading to other disciplines as an optimization strategy from early stages of design.…”
Section: Figure 1: Multi-criteria Methodology Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, deviations are problematic and should be eliminated by forcing reality to be like the conceptions. If this does not happen then deviations must be due to inadequate knowledge or incompetent actions by the people involved (as argued by Fox et al (2001) on making construction through manufacturing). This view determines that someone should have known about problems, or taken them into account, or communicated the operation of the ideas better.…”
Section: Critique Of Conventional Pre-conceptualizationmentioning
confidence: 97%