2017
DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design for social enterprises. Co-designing an organizational and cultural change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include how individual citizens are involved in developing innovative services in public spaces through an urban living lab project (Nesti, 2018) and how service users can facilitate the personalisation of adult social care (Flemig and Osborne, 2019). In this process, service users are involved as co-producers who participate actively in the service planning and implementation to improve service quality (Mazzei et al, 2020;Selloni and Corubolo, 2017) rather than just assuming the role of passive service users. Following Osborne et al (2016), this individual lens can also be extended to include actors in the immediate environments of the service usersfor example, their families and social workers, who also give input to the service delivery system.…”
Section: Co-production In Social Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples include how individual citizens are involved in developing innovative services in public spaces through an urban living lab project (Nesti, 2018) and how service users can facilitate the personalisation of adult social care (Flemig and Osborne, 2019). In this process, service users are involved as co-producers who participate actively in the service planning and implementation to improve service quality (Mazzei et al, 2020;Selloni and Corubolo, 2017) rather than just assuming the role of passive service users. Following Osborne et al (2016), this individual lens can also be extended to include actors in the immediate environments of the service usersfor example, their families and social workers, who also give input to the service delivery system.…”
Section: Co-production In Social Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Burgess and Durrant (2019) examined how a time-credit SE in the UK engages individual volunteers from a reciprocal exchange angle. Similarly, Selloni and Corubolo (2017) studied how SEs engage service users and other local actors in co-designing their services in a customised and collaborative form. However, what is lacking in the extant literature is how SEs engage in co-production from an integrative view of individual and collective action and what practices are involved in these co-production processes (Bovaird, 2015).…”
Section: Co-production In Social Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban and Kujinga (2017) claimed that SEs focus on tangible outcomes, while Hieu (2017) found that SEs have communication that is more open, feature less rigorous management control and are marketoriented organisations. In contrast, Selloni and Corubolo (2017) argued that many SEs are too centralised with a high degree of bureaucratisation (top-down approach). Table 1.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Social Enterprise: Characteristics Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A atuação de designers em projetos de inovação social está fundamentada na colaboração e participação dos atores envolvidos (SELLONI; CORUBOLO, 2017a;MANZINI, 2017). Ademais, Brown e Wyatt (2010) apresentam o design thinking como uma abordagem benéfica para tais projetos.…”
Section: Design Para Inovação Socialunclassified