Creative Commons CC-BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
ArticleDesign ideation is often synonymous with drawing. The "napkin sketch" that quickly captures a design idea for a prospective client remains part of design lore. The design thinking literature rightly emphasizes the importance of graphic representation (and re-representation), modes of ideation, and ultimately, clear communication of ideas for a strong design process. Yet, novice designers-students learning the design process-often struggle to communicate their ideas. They are unclear about how they are solving a problem, so may be unsure what to draw or how to explain their ideas. Their colleagues and instructors may be similarly uncertain what student designers are thinking and would welcome any communication that clarifies the students' intention. Design process and communication is more complex than we often assume.The design thinking literature primarily explores ideation as a component of the design process. Although both novice and expert designers have been used as populations in past research, the focus has frequently been more about understanding design process rather than understanding how to teach students a rigorous design process. Subsequently, the literature on design process remains only loosely connected to scholarship-of-teaching-and-learning (SOTL) research about how students learn to design in architecture and interior design curriculums. Design educators would benefit from research that specifically investigates how students are thinking and communicating (a) with themselves and (b) within a collaborative environment. The purpose of this article is to identify ways in which students visualize and represent the design thinking process across the conceptual and schematic design phases. The documentation and discussion of this information will provide a basis for design educators to shape the ways they teach the design process and support students.As a whole, this article looks broadly at two layers of information. First, our understanding of current theory related to design ideation and re-representation provides a base for inquiry. Relevant design thinking literature-which addresses ideation and sketching as part of the design process-provides context for this research study. Second, observation and analysis of student process compares how this process aligns with existing theory. This comparison contributes to design education by linking teaching and learning with the rigorous research that explains design process. This article is structured into four sections. The "Literature Review" section of the article overviews relevant 663285S GOXXX10.1177/2158244016663285SAGE OpenOrthel and Day
Abstr...