2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00375-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, Implementation, and Validation of a Pulsatile Heart Phantom Pump

Abstract: The developments in Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance allow visualization of blood flow in vivo using these techniques. However, validation tests are needed to determine a gold standard. For the validation tests, controllable systems that can generate pulsatile flow are needed. In this study, we aimed to develop an affordable pulsatile pump and an artificial circulatory system to simulate the blood flow for validation purposes. Initially, the prerequisites for the phantom were pulsating flow outp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of pre-collected visualisation data is reported in Bock et al [35], whilst Meagher et al [36] demonstrate an interesting approach by imaging identical phantoms simultaneously. There is no evidence of both real-time device and real-time flow QA beyond Vali, [28] Durand [29] and Tuncay [37], whose phantoms exhibit fairly simple flow profiles. This forms part of a trend presented in Figure 12 and Figure 13 below, which is that the more complex the flow, the less confidence is achieved through real-time flow QA.…”
Section: Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of pre-collected visualisation data is reported in Bock et al [35], whilst Meagher et al [36] demonstrate an interesting approach by imaging identical phantoms simultaneously. There is no evidence of both real-time device and real-time flow QA beyond Vali, [28] Durand [29] and Tuncay [37], whose phantoms exhibit fairly simple flow profiles. This forms part of a trend presented in Figure 12 and Figure 13 below, which is that the more complex the flow, the less confidence is achieved through real-time flow QA.…”
Section: Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%