Design Merged X for Eco-product Development

Shen, Jing; Peng, Lichao; Zhang, Yilun; Zhang, Zhinan

doi:10.1007/978-981-13-9271-9_2

Cited by 2 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It overlooks novel methods or design concepts that are tailored to the characteristics of furniture design that will entice architects and designers to produce creative and sustainable furniture designs to satisfy future demands [15,27]. Designers are seldom exposed to sustainability considerations at the early design stage, which affect product cost and lead to unsustainable products being produced for users [28,29]. Consequently, most new furniture designs and prototypes fail to reach successful standards.…”

Section: Rationale Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2019, Shen et al [28] developed a Design merge X (DMX)-related framework; a combination of industrial design and product design with the conventional design for X (DFX) method. The approach aimed to help designers evaluate the entire design in the early design stage to prevent rework and design changes.…”

Section: Design Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Effective design and manufacturing processes vigorously promote the quality of product innovation. The innovation trend influences manufacturing feasibility through industrial design, playing an essential role in this process [28]. Thus, the adaptation of manufacturing abilities, such as designs for disassembly, reuse, and remanufacturing, is considered in the design stage [70].…”

Section: Environment-manufacturingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[103] (i) Rough Milling (ii) Sawing Operations (iii) Band-Saw (iv) Shaper (v) Router (vi) Borer (vii) Mortiser (viii) Tenoner (ix) Lathe (x) Joint formation (xi) Abrasive Sanding Process (xii) CNC Machines (xiii) Through-Feed Machine Lines (xiv) Finishing and Surface Coating (xv) Packaging of Finished Goods Define according to the bill of materials [30] Reduce assembly time [85] Recyclability benefit rate [67] Implement DFMA approach [28] Product discard rates [75] Lower defects [31] Employ as few manufacturing steps as possible [55] Minimise packaging [55] 6.1.8. Social-User Satisfaction Product sustainability development requires approaching users to ensure that sustainability awareness is acceptable and applicable.…”

Section: Subcriteria Design Guideline Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Choice of specific production processes [60,62,91,103] Defined according to the bill of materials [30] Reduce assembly time [85] Recyclability benefit rate [67] Implement DFA, DFM, or DFMA approach [28,75] Product discard rates [75] Lower defects [31] Employ as few manufacturing steps as possible [55] Minimize packaging [55] Table A6. Cont.…”

Section: Materials Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The design of furniture products is influenced by increasing consumer interest in green products and sustainability values. However, although the demand for sustainable furniture products is high, the standardization of sustainability characteristics in furniture design has still not been achieved. A thorough literature review was conducted, which considered various sustainability characteristics that apply in industries that design furniture. This review paper aimed to identify common sustainability characteristics so that a new standard for furniture industries can be established. In this review, numerous themes were explored relating to design guidelines, design criteria, design preferences, design optimization, design evaluation and assessment, design decision making, strategic planning, design strategies, the integration of eco-design, and eco-design tools. A total of 137 articles were reviewed regarding their sustainability characteristics according to the triple bottom-line framework for a relevant product sector. Due to the limited reports on the sustainability characteristics of furniture design activities, this paper also tried to include common sustainability characteristics of non-furniture products that are available on the market. Through the review, 10 sustainability characteristics were identified for the environment, 17 for the economy, and 16 for the social dimension as being common among manufacturers when designing their products. A further in-depth analysis was conducted by mapping the characteristics to those that were significantly implemented in the design process, of which five (5) were environmental, two (2) were economic, and five (5) were social sustainability characteristics. This review is significant in helping furniture designers to use appropriate and effective sustainability standards in the design and manufacture of products that meet customers’ demands. Previous literature reviews have not clearly measured the triple bottom line. Furthermore, no definite characteristics were proposed in previous works regarding wooden furniture design, leaving a gap to be closed by future works.

show abstract

Section: Rationale Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Design Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Environment-manufacturingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Subcriteria Design Guideline Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Materials Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Design for the environment: An ontology‐based knowledge management model for green product development

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Through appropriate operations and policies, such as green processes and product development process (PDP), companies can respond to environmental sustainability.To remain competitive, one such approach, Design for X (DFX), involves considering different environment and sustainable strategies through different factors Xs. With regard to the availability of different DFX techniques that consider environmental issues, the decision as to which approach needs to be adopted remains absent. This paper aims at presenting an overview from 1980 to 2020 of the developed research, applications, and DFX techniques for assessing green issues. Selected DFX techniques are linked with strategies used in organizations. Following a literature analysis, a collaborative knowledge-based framework that addresses the design concepts needed to assess environmental, safety, and health concerns in the development of green products is proposed. Furthermore, as a pillar for considering the Semantic Web and an evolving approach linked with natural language processing (NLP) and artificial intelligence (AI), an ontology-based knowledge management model for green assessment is developed for the representation, acquisition, organization, and capitalization of knowledge in a computer interpretable manner. The findings are useful for both managers and practitioners as they provide a coherent domain ontology that can help them manage knowledge, improve teamwork, and make decisions in a collaborative green PDP. Besides, an understanding of the essential design considerations that are required to implement environmental, safety, and health issues, as well as competencies used in the PDP is presented. Key barriers, managerial and strategic implications, and mitigation actions are also identified in this paper.

show abstract

Design Merged X for Eco-product Development

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design

A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design

Design for the environment: An ontology‐based knowledge management model for green product development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About