2009
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cdt:20080036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design networks-on-chip with latency/bandwidth guarantees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…traffic classification, flit-based switching and path pre-assignment and link-BW setting has been introduced [7]. The traffic are classified into guaranteed-latency (GL), guaranteed-bandwidth (GB) and best-effort (BE) traffic.…”
Section: Comparisons Of the Multiple Access Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…traffic classification, flit-based switching and path pre-assignment and link-BW setting has been introduced [7]. The traffic are classified into guaranteed-latency (GL), guaranteed-bandwidth (GB) and best-effort (BE) traffic.…”
Section: Comparisons Of the Multiple Access Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GB traffic requires constant end-to-end communication bandwidth, while the BE traffic does not have bandwidth requirement neither stringent data transfer latency. The link allocation (path assignments) for the GL and GB traffic is static or computed off-line at design time [7]. For a new application, the path assignment must be done again at design time.…”
Section: Comparisons Of the Multiple Access Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%