2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1324854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Carbon Tax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
159
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
159
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, if the government learns that the marginal harm is different than it first believed, the tax should be changed to reflect the new information. Metcalf and Weisbach (2009) consider the design of a carbon tax. They show that a carbon tax in the United States could cover 80% of total emissions by taxing less than 2,500 entities.…”
Section: Basic Definitions and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, if the government learns that the marginal harm is different than it first believed, the tax should be changed to reflect the new information. Metcalf and Weisbach (2009) consider the design of a carbon tax. They show that a carbon tax in the United States could cover 80% of total emissions by taxing less than 2,500 entities.…”
Section: Basic Definitions and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the price goes above a set amount, the government will issue new permits at that price, effectively converting the system into a tax at the ceiling price. Similarly, if the price goes down below a set amount, the government will repurchase permits, ensuring that they do not go 16 Metcalf and Weisbach (2009). 17 For a discussion of this system, see Jacoby and Ellerman (2004).…”
Section: Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metcalf and Weisbach (2009) suggest that if the tax is applied in this manner, taxing a few thousand fossil fuel firms could cover roughly 80% of US CO 2e emissions.…”
Section: Tax Base and Point Of Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in theory, petroleum taxes have the potential of not only improving environmental quality but also raising revenue and reducing welfare costs offering a so-called "double dividend" (Pearce, 1991). However, in practice, the answer to how large motor fuel taxes should be is less than straightforward (Metcalf and Weisbach, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%