2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a compact absorber with a hydrophobic membrane contactor at the liquid–vapor interface for lithium bromide–water absorption chillers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 8 presents variations of the absorption rate as a function of pressure potential for the present study as well as two membrane-based [14,15], a vertical tube [7], three horizontal tube [2,4,5] and a vertical wall [1] absorber configurations. The solution water vapor pressure used in the calculation (P s,w ) is the average of the solution water vapor pressure (calculated using the corresponding solution temperature and concentration [15]) at the absorber inlet and exit.…”
Section: Absorption Ratementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fig. 8 presents variations of the absorption rate as a function of pressure potential for the present study as well as two membrane-based [14,15], a vertical tube [7], three horizontal tube [2,4,5] and a vertical wall [1] absorber configurations. The solution water vapor pressure used in the calculation (P s,w ) is the average of the solution water vapor pressure (calculated using the corresponding solution temperature and concentration [15]) at the absorber inlet and exit.…”
Section: Absorption Ratementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The authors reported that to achieve a higher water vapor flux, the membrane pore sizes should range from 0.45 mm to 1.0 mm, while having a porosity of up to 80%. After this experimental study, Ali [42] proposed a design for a compact plates-and-frames absorber with a hydrophobic microporous membrane contactor at the aqueous solution-water vapor interface. The main design parameters obtained were a membrane contactor area of 6.06 m 2 , a ratio of the mass transfer area to absorber net volume of 130.1 (m 2 /m 3 ), and ratio of mass transfer membrane area to required for heat transfer was 1.162, respectively.…”
Section: Membrane Absorbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P v and P s are the bulk vapour pressure and the water vapour partial pressure corresponding to the bulk solution concentration (x) and temperature (T s ), according to Ali [14]. The overall mass transfer resistance between the bulk water vapour and bulk aqueous solution (R ov ) includes the resistance to diffusion through the aqueous solution boundary layer (R s ) and the resistance to diffusion of water vapour through the membrane active layer (R m ).…”
Section: Mass Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(38), k v is the thermal conductivity of the vapour inside the membrane pores, while k m is the thermal conductivity of the membrane solid material. A polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mem brane has been selected, with thermal conductivity equal to 0.22 W/mK, the same used by Ali [14].…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%