2019
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2018.2838071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Hybrid RF Fingerprint Extraction and Device Classification Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DCTF does not require any prior synchronization information about the receiver, which makes it a kind of stable transmitter feature that can be extracted at the receiver. Besides, The research in [37] verified that DCTF is a stable RF fingerprint through experimental measurements for 18 months, which will not vary significantly over time. Moreover, this method is also effective for signals modulated in other ways.…”
Section: Dctf-based Rf Fingerprint Extractionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DCTF does not require any prior synchronization information about the receiver, which makes it a kind of stable transmitter feature that can be extracted at the receiver. Besides, The research in [37] verified that DCTF is a stable RF fingerprint through experimental measurements for 18 months, which will not vary significantly over time. Moreover, this method is also effective for signals modulated in other ways.…”
Section: Dctf-based Rf Fingerprint Extractionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…• The existing applications of DCTF [19,30,37,38] are for the classification of known devices, while this paper solves the problem of rogue device identification. This problem is more challenging since we cannot obtain any prior information about rogue devices.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification error rate is as low as 0.048 in the LOS scenario, and 0.1105, even when a different receiver is used for classification, 18 months after the training. In 2019, Wang et al selected different characteristics of RF fingerprints and compareed the identification accuracy of Zigbee devices with five classification algorithms [30]. The experimental research shows that the highest identification accuracy reached approximately 100% by using multi-features of frequency offset, IQ offset, and circle offset based on the neural network algorithm under a high SNR.…”
Section: Rf Fingerprint Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has focused on using RFF technology to authenticate mobile devices [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. This authentication method requires the device to be authenticated to provide a claimed identity in advance.…”
Section: Rf Fingerprint Authenticationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the inherent characteristics and specifications of different IoT devices (e. g., radio frequency) are not completely consistent, RF fingerprinting technology detects and identifies different devices by extracting subtle differences. In addition, the process of RF fingerprinting recognition usually includes two steps: training and classification [12]- [14], which are shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%