2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11265-017-1221-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Low-Complexity Real-Time Arrhythmia Detection System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A low complexity system has been proposed by Chang et al which use simple features to classify ECG signals. The scores for this system are above 98 percent for both sensitivity and specificity; however, the PVC scores are not available in the presented results (Chang, et al 2017). Regarding QRS detection Andrysiak et al used a sparse ECG signal representation based on dictionaries and they used neural networks to detect these (Andrysiak 2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A low complexity system has been proposed by Chang et al which use simple features to classify ECG signals. The scores for this system are above 98 percent for both sensitivity and specificity; however, the PVC scores are not available in the presented results (Chang, et al 2017). Regarding QRS detection Andrysiak et al used a sparse ECG signal representation based on dictionaries and they used neural networks to detect these (Andrysiak 2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One arrhythmia that belongs to these groups is the Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) or its synonym Ventricular Ectopic Beat (VEB). This arrhythmia is very difficult to detect why it is subjected to intensive researched (Luz, et al 2016), (Jambukia, Dabhi og Prajapati 2015), (Chang, et al 2017). This paper discusses, elaborates, and designs a model for a novel PVC classifier that focuses on classifying PVC beats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses datasets from AFDB MIT-BIH [ 46 ] and MITDB-MIT-BIH [ 63 ]. In the MITDB data, this study extracted two types of arrhythmia (PAC and PVC, with symbols’ A’ and’ V’ respectively) and normal data with symbols’ N.’ As for AFDB data, this study extracts AF data with the symbol’ AFIB’ and normal data’ N.’ According to each record’s label, MITDB and AFDB data are read.…”
Section: Section 5: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%