2012
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.21735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a multivariable internal model controller based on singular value decomposition

Abstract: In this article, a novel internal model control (IMC) approach based on singular value decomposition (SVD) is proposed for the control of multipleinput-multiple-output (MIMO) systems with multiple time delays. This approach achieves decoupling using a compensation term and improves the robustness using SVD in the inverse of the steady-state gain matrix of process. Meanwhile, a novel filter is designed for decoupling and fast response speed of multivariable systems with multiple delays. The design of the contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The controller tuning parameter α of 1.1 is designed to give γ of 0.98, which is equivalent to the IMC controller. The performance of the proposed scheme is compared with the IMC controller designed based on the singular value decomposition (SVD) proposed by Jin et al The IMC controller parameters for the shell standard control problem are given by: GcIMC(s) = true[leftcenter2.9733s+0.07915.7412s2+7.0541s+1e0.4878s 7.8971s0.00321.5885s2+17.4078s+1e7.8553scenter1.2497s0.3360.3524s2+15.0875s+1e11.769s 2.4715s+0.27511.1188s2+11.1794s+1e12.3746scenter0.9954s+0.21671.2501s2+3.2418s+1e5.4051s 0.5132s0.08065.3295s2+2.2549s+1e4.1735strue] …”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The controller tuning parameter α of 1.1 is designed to give γ of 0.98, which is equivalent to the IMC controller. The performance of the proposed scheme is compared with the IMC controller designed based on the singular value decomposition (SVD) proposed by Jin et al The IMC controller parameters for the shell standard control problem are given by: GcIMC(s) = true[leftcenter2.9733s+0.07915.7412s2+7.0541s+1e0.4878s 7.8971s0.00321.5885s2+17.4078s+1e7.8553scenter1.2497s0.3360.3524s2+15.0875s+1e11.769s 2.4715s+0.27511.1188s2+11.1794s+1e12.3746scenter0.9954s+0.21671.2501s2+3.2418s+1e5.4051s 0.5132s0.08065.3295s2+2.2549s+1e4.1735strue] …”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most control design methods for non‐square processes usually realize a square controller by adding or deleting variables, which might cause degradation in system performance due to the loss of system information, especially for the minimum phase non‐square systems . Many research methods focusing on non‐square systems are based on matrix computation, if the transfer function matrix is non‐square, then the issue of inversion will often emerge …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral square error (ISE) values were used to quantitatively evaluate the performance of closed‐loop systems . However, Jin has adopted another method to measure overall ISE values for a TITO system . For a unit step in R1 in Figure , the ISE corresponding to the Y1 is ISEY1R1=0false(1Y1false)2dt, and the ISE corresponding to the interaction response is ISEY2R1=0false(0Y2false)2dt.…”
Section: Simulation Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, to illustrate stability, robustness of the proposed control system, input, and output uncertainties are considered. For a process G(s) with an input uncertainty of G(s)[I+normalΔI(jw)], the closed‐loop is stable if the following is true: true∥normalΔItrue(normaljnormalwtrue)true∥<1true/σmaxtrue{[I+Dfalse(normaljnormalwfalse)Cfalse(normaljnormalwfalse)Gfalse(normaljwfalse)]1D(jw)C(jw)G(jw)true} …”
Section: Simulation Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation