2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a pilot scale directly irradiated, high temperature, and low pressure moving particle cavity chamber for metal oxide reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the system initially increases as receiver pressure increases because of decreasing vacuum pump work up to 60 Pa, and then efficiency decreases as pressure increases because of a drop in hydrogen production rate. This is in line with the operating pressure limits reported by Brendelberger et al [36] The output values of the single-receiver system at optimized receiver pressure and flux density are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Single-receiver Systemsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency of the system initially increases as receiver pressure increases because of decreasing vacuum pump work up to 60 Pa, and then efficiency decreases as pressure increases because of a drop in hydrogen production rate. This is in line with the operating pressure limits reported by Brendelberger et al [36] The output values of the single-receiver system at optimized receiver pressure and flux density are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Single-receiver Systemsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This limitation was addressed using a cascading pressure reactor where the thermal reduction happens in multiple stages successively at low pressures. [32][33][34][35][36] This enables the DOI: 10.1002/ente.202100220 Solar thermochemical water-splitting cycle models for hydrogen production with single and multiple receivers working between 1773 and 1173 K are developed. The receiver pressures and aperture sizes are optimized for maximum cycle efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both redox reactions can be performed in the same fixed-bed reactor but at different times in a cyclic sequential mode (Hathaway et al, 2016;Haeussler et al, 2020;Marxer et al, 2017). Alternatively, it could be operated continuously using a particle transport reactor (Ermanoski et al, 2013;Singh et al, 2017;Welte et al,2016). The process is illustrated in Figure 5, where it is important to note that reduction and oxidation are either taking place at different times or in separate reaction chambers.…”
Section: Examples Of the Performance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, such a constraint is eliminated since the reactive pellets remain fixed inside the reactor, while non-stoichiometric ceria undergoes solid-state redox reactions. Eliminating particle transport between reaction steps is beneficial because the need for continuous particle feeding and collection is bypassed [40]. Avoiding solid flow is advantageous for scaled-up process, while the gas flow rate can be kept at minimum value.…”
Section: Ceria Pellets Characteristics and Expected Benefits For The Solar Processmentioning
confidence: 99%