2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of adaptive transonic laminar airfoils using theγ-Re˜θttransition model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the numerical transition is outside the experimental transition region then an error is calculated between the numerical value and the closest boundary value. If the calculated error is less than 6%, the error is considered as acceptable 30 . Figure 12 presents an example where the numerical transition matches the experimental transition region and an example where the numerical transition does not match and the error is computed for the this case.…”
Section: Optimization Results Versus Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the numerical transition is outside the experimental transition region then an error is calculated between the numerical value and the closest boundary value. If the calculated error is less than 6%, the error is considered as acceptable 30 . Figure 12 presents an example where the numerical transition matches the experimental transition region and an example where the numerical transition does not match and the error is computed for the this case.…”
Section: Optimization Results Versus Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robitaille et al 38 examines the design of adaptive laminar airfoils in transonic flow using -Re˜θ t transition model as a transition prediction method. Huan et al 39 developed an effective robust design optimization (RDO) which is based on an adjusted polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) method for designing high performance transonic high lift natural laminar flow (NLF) airfoil for operating at low Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Calculate C D at C L 2 with a Proportional Integral Derivative controller [30] over the angle of attack for an accurate evaluation of…”
Section: Calculatementioning
confidence: 99%