2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9112291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an Active and Passive Control System of Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation

Abstract: Aiming at stroke patients’ hand rehabilitation training, we present a hand exoskeleton with both active and passive control modes for neural rehabilitation. The exoskeleton control system is designed as a human–robot interaction control system based on field-programmable gate array (FPGA) and Android mobile terminal with good portability and openness. Passive rehabilitation pattern based on proportional derivative (PD) inverse dynamic control method and active rehabilitation pattern based on impedance method, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One can mention, among advantages, that the proposed design offers a specified center of rotation for the MPC joint, in contrast to the solutions proposed by Chiri et al [6]. It can be said that the current design can offer a natural movement of the wearer's hand, compared to other fully-actuated exoskeleton models, such as those presented in Zhang et al [55], where each joint is independently actuated, thus involving a highly complicated control algorithm, due to the fact that the exoskeleton does not adapt very well to different anthropological dimensions and behaviors. On the other hand, one can mention as disadvantages the lack of certainty for each of the joints' positions, which obviously is a negative characteristic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can mention, among advantages, that the proposed design offers a specified center of rotation for the MPC joint, in contrast to the solutions proposed by Chiri et al [6]. It can be said that the current design can offer a natural movement of the wearer's hand, compared to other fully-actuated exoskeleton models, such as those presented in Zhang et al [55], where each joint is independently actuated, thus involving a highly complicated control algorithm, due to the fact that the exoskeleton does not adapt very well to different anthropological dimensions and behaviors. On the other hand, one can mention as disadvantages the lack of certainty for each of the joints' positions, which obviously is a negative characteristic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, this device has the ability to present easily changeable components based on the person's anthropological measurements. Another advantage resides in a more compact design for DIP and PIP joints, compared to other underactuated models (as well as some fully-actuated models) such as those of Shields et al [35], Wege et al [36], and Zhang et al [55]. One can mention, among advantages, that the proposed design offers a specified center of rotation for the MPC joint, in contrast to the solutions proposed by Chiri et al [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [30], the authors designed a wearable exoskeleton mechatronics system based on active and passive control approaches for single-finger rehabilitation. The proposed device is operated by a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) and controlled through an Android smartphone application.…”
Section: Appl Sci 2021 11 X For Peer Review 3 Of 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical implementation, the control strategies applied in rehabilitation robots directly determine the performance of robot-assisted rehabilitation training [18]. Currently, the existing rehabilitation control schemes can be classified into two types according to the participation degree of patients, i.e., the passive training control strategies [19]- [21] for the patients at the acute period to passively conduct repetitive movement tasks along predefined trajectory, and the cooperative training control strategies [22]- [26] for the patients at the recovery period to be actively engaged in the therapy training program. In [27], a passive training control approach combined with neuron proportion-integral and feedforward compensation control was developed to reduce the trajectory tracking error of a pneumatic muscles-driven rehabilitation robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%