2020
DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4782-4788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an adaptive state feedback controller for a magnetic levitation system

Abstract: This paper presents designing an adaptive state feedback controller (ASFC) for a magnetic levitation system (MLS), which is an unstable system and has high nonlinearity and represents a challenging control problem. First, a nonadaptive state feedback controller (SFC) is designed by linearization about a selected equilibrium point and designing a SFC by pole-placement method to achieve maximum overshoot of 1.5% and settling time of 1s (5% criterion). When the operating point changes, the designed controller can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim is to find the corresponding control law u such that the linear system ( 25) is for state variables (24) equivalent to nonlinear system (23) with the appropriately determined control u. Note that z 3 in (24) corresponds to the right hand side of dx 2 dt in (23). Thus, u conforming to the dx 3 dt in ( 23) should be determined so that dz 3 dt in ( 25) is fulfilled.…”
Section: Nonlinear Control Of Magnetic Levitation Using Feedback Line...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim is to find the corresponding control law u such that the linear system ( 25) is for state variables (24) equivalent to nonlinear system (23) with the appropriately determined control u. Note that z 3 in (24) corresponds to the right hand side of dx 2 dt in (23). Thus, u conforming to the dx 3 dt in ( 23) should be determined so that dz 3 dt in ( 25) is fulfilled.…”
Section: Nonlinear Control Of Magnetic Levitation Using Feedback Line...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic levitation plant, where a magnetic object is positioned in the air space, provides a challenging control task owing to strong nonlinearity and inherent instability. Various methods have been proposed to control the magnetic levitation, as for example feedback linearization approach in [21,22], adaptive state feedback [23], frequency domain method [24] or CDM (Coefficient Diagram Method) based design in [4]. Most of them consider continuous-time control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17,21], a linearized model of magnetic levitation is derived based on first principles, the former uses Jacobian linearization, while the latter applies a general linearization technique. Various continuous-time control schemes for magnetic levitation can be found, for example, feedback linearization approach in [18], CDM based design in [19], adaptive state feedback [20]; in all these papers, the results were verified by simulation. To the authors' best knowledge, there are no papers on discrete-time pole-placement for magnetic levitation, besides our recent results [16,23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Magnetic levitation belongs to challenging plants to control, due to its nonlinearity, instability and fast dynamics, with broad application area. Many authors devoted their research to modeling and control of a magnetic levitation system, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In [17,21], a linearized model of magnetic levitation is derived based on first principles, the former uses Jacobian linearization, while the latter applies a general linearization technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, single or multiple input output systems can also be analysed [17], [18]. The principle of feedback of all state variables feeding the input of the system was through a feedback matrix in the control strategy is preferable using full-state variable feedback control [19], [20]. State feedback is very useful for multi-input multi-output systems and for control systems with optimum constraints, such as those requiring a minimum time to final value or minimal control effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%