2010 Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe Conference &Amp; Exhibition (DATE 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/date.2010.5457147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of an automotive traffic sign recognition system targeting a multi-core SoC implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphological operations are then applied to clean up small holes in objects, thus avoiding unnecessary processing on objects which are too small to be successfully recognised even if they are traffic signs. Some FPGA-based accelerator solutions exist [10][11][12][13]. The work in [11] uses a MicroBlaze processor on a Virtex-5 with hardware accelerators for colour filtering and morphological operations on images of 320x240 pixels; it computes in 777ms.…”
Section: Flagsand Branchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morphological operations are then applied to clean up small holes in objects, thus avoiding unnecessary processing on objects which are too small to be successfully recognised even if they are traffic signs. Some FPGA-based accelerator solutions exist [10][11][12][13]. The work in [11] uses a MicroBlaze processor on a Virtex-5 with hardware accelerators for colour filtering and morphological operations on images of 320x240 pixels; it computes in 777ms.…”
Section: Flagsand Branchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [11] uses a MicroBlaze processor on a Virtex-5 with hardware accelerators for colour filtering and morphological operations on images of 320x240 pixels; it computes in 777ms. In [12], LEON3 CPUs are used in a Virtex4 FPGA, but this leaves little room for custom accelerators; their design completes within 600ms, but the image size is not discussed. The Altera-based Cyclone II based design in [13] does not consider circular traffic signs.…”
Section: Flagsand Branchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing an autonomic computing system with these features could be very challenging [7,13,17]. It is hard to control the interactions between all the autonomic components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include conventional (general purpose) computers [20], custom ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) chips [21], field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) [22][23][24][25], digital signal processors (DSPs) [26] and also graphic processing units [27]. Although it is difficult to make a direct comparison due to differences in the TSR algorithms employed, the following section discusses the motivation and outcomes of these hardware architectures with respect to the proposed hardware/software solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the absence of any preprocessing step (sign detection) in the algorithm makes it difficult to recognize a potential sign in a raw image, and the effective accuracy is lower. Another FPGA architecture given in [24] uses a multi-core SoC implementation, targeting a latency of less than 600 ms (maximum latency for a car traveling at a speed of 180 km/h). Specifically, a Gaisler/Pender Electronics FPGA board, GR-CPCI-XC4V [28], is used for hosting a dual core LEON-3 processor and realizing a dedicated hardware accelerator for the support vector machine kernel used in the TSR algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%