Design of an instrument to assess students’ perception of learning objects in statistics

Monge-Rogel, Ricardo; Durán-González, Guillermo; Panes-Martínez, Mónica; Hernández, Luís Gibran Juárez

doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11011-w

Cited by 2 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The purpose of the IPDLR-S instrument (Monge-Rogel et al, 2022) is to evaluate the perception of undergraduate students about the use of DLR in a statistics subject. The instrument consists of 32 items grouped in three dimensions: Functionality and Accessibility of the DLR (7 items), Design and Structure of the DLR (13 items), and Learning of the Statistics (12 items); and for the answers, it uses the Likert scale of six options (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = moderately disagree, 4 = moderately agree, 5 = agree, and 6 = strongly agree).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As it was indicated, after its construction, the instrument was submitted to a trial of 31 experts, through which its validity of content was determined (Monge-Rogel et al, 2022). Once this phase was concluded, a pilot was carried out with 50 undergraduate students of a statistics subject, through which the reliability of the instrument and the degree of affordability were analyzed, resulting in high reliability (ordinal Cronbach’s alpha = .963) and a high degree of acceptance and satisfaction with the instrument (Monge-Rogel et al, 2022).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An aspect to highlight of the IPDLR-S instrument is that after its construction, it was subjected to the analysis of the psychometric property of content validity (Monge-Rogel et al, 2022), through which it was demonstrated that the dimensions and items that make it up are relevant, pertinent and representatives of the construct to be evaluated (Koller et al, 2017;Jua´rez-Herna´ndez & Tobo´n, 2018). This is relevant since, as Carvajal et al (2011) refer to, the evaluation of the psychometric properties of an instrument is an essential criterion to determine the quality of its measurement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been indicated that digital resources and specifically LO, can enhance or improve student learning (Kay & Knaack, 2009); therefore, evidence of their effectiveness from the perspective of the student for learning support becomes especially important (Chiu & Churchill, 2016; Garay Ruiz et al, 2017). However, there are few instruments to assess the students’ perceptions of the LO, only including Kay and Knaack’s (2009), which is aimed at high school students, and the one from Monge-Rogel et al (2022), which is aimed at students of higher education.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this regard, the contribution of Monge-Rogel et al (2022) is called “Instrument of Perception of the use of Digital Learning Resources in Statistics” (IPDLR-S), consists of 32 items and 3 dimensions: 1. Functionality and Accessibility of the DLR; 2.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Evaluate Students’ Perception of Learning Objects in Statistics

Durán-González,

Panes-Martínez,

Monge-Rogel

et al. 2023

Sage Open

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital Learning Resources (DLRs) have the function of facilitating learning; however, the evaluation regarding their functionality is limited since there are few tools for this purpose. Of these, the instrument that stands out is “Perception of the use of Digital Learning Resources in Statistics” (IPDLR-S), which allows for evaluating the perception of undergraduate university students about the functionality of the LDRs. With the objective of providing a tool with scientific quality, the IPDLR-S instrument underwent to an analysis of construct validity and reliability. The instrument was applied to 1,148 university students, the construct validity analysis was performed using an exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analysis, and the reliability was determined by ordinal Cronbach’s alpha. According to the EFA, it was found that all the items are represented in the factorial model; however, differences were found for the theoretical model since a fourth dimension emerges (Cooperative Learning). On the other hand, using the CFA, the resulting factorial model showed a good fit (GFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.064, CFI = 0.999, and TLI = 0.999). Overall reliability, as well as by factor showed an optimal value (ordinal Cronbach’s alpha > .98). The IPDLR-S instrument has adequate psychometric properties.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Evaluate Students’ Perception of Learning Objects in Statistics

Durán-González,

Panes-Martínez,

Monge-Rogel

et al. 2023

Sage Open

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Validity of the multidimensional reputation perception scale in private universities

Amado-Mateus,

Guzmán Rincón,

Juarez

et al. 2024

Front. Educ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

University reputation is the result of the assessments that the stakeholders make of the university, especially the user of the education service, the student. The literature has shown an important impact of reputation on the student’s perception of the university, and it has been related to success, competitiveness, sustainability, stakeholder decision-making and the differential of the value offer. Therefore, its evaluation has been the subject of several studies that seek to measure and assess reputation in higher education to understand how to manage it. This article evaluates the psychometric properties of the reputation scale in students at private universities in Colombia. The methodology used included an adaptation of the scale to the Spanish language, content validity analysis, reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed the validity and reliability of the scale and, through the analyses carried out, provided evidence of the scale’s robustness.

show abstract

Design of an instrument to assess students’ perception of learning objects in statistics

Cited by 2 publications

References 48 publications

Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Evaluate Students’ Perception of Learning Objects in Statistics

Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Evaluate Students’ Perception of Learning Objects in Statistics

Validity of the multidimensional reputation perception scale in private universities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About