1972
DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1972.5952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Conventional Rail Track Foundations.

Abstract: The background, philosophy and approach to the problem are discussed and previous work is summarized. Measurements of the distribution of vertical stress in the subgrade for given depths of ballast, track structural configurations and loading conditions are described. It is shown that the mean maximum vertical stress in the subgrade can be predicted with reasonable accuracy by simple elastic theory. The results of laboratory work in which samples of soil were subjected to repeated triaxial loading are presente… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as previously outlined, a decreased dynamic stress is shown to be associated with and increased vibration time. Consequently, below a specified level of dynamic stress, soil deformation does not occur, with this specified level of stress defined as the critical strength (σcr) (Heath, Waters, Shenton & Sparrow, 1972), as previously demonstrated (Liu, 2010;Li, 2010;Zhou, 1998). Based upon results and figures about dynamic stress obtained within the current study, characteristic σcr for test samples are presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Critical Dynamic Strength and Equation Developmentmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, as previously outlined, a decreased dynamic stress is shown to be associated with and increased vibration time. Consequently, below a specified level of dynamic stress, soil deformation does not occur, with this specified level of stress defined as the critical strength (σcr) (Heath, Waters, Shenton & Sparrow, 1972), as previously demonstrated (Liu, 2010;Li, 2010;Zhou, 1998). Based upon results and figures about dynamic stress obtained within the current study, characteristic σcr for test samples are presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Critical Dynamic Strength and Equation Developmentmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Such a design then only needs to consider permanent deformation as a function of strength and material stiffness based on limiting applied stresses through the composite foundation structure (assuming the capping and sub-base have sufficient strength to avoid internal permanent deformations). Such an approach forms the basis for the method of determining the design thickness of the unbound layers for UK railway track (Heath et al, 1972), in which RLTT data were used to define a limiting stress (i.e. 0.5q max ) that was then related to empirically measured/observed field performance.…”
Section: Triaxial Tests Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth of ballast and sub-ballast (sometimes termed the granular layer) are specified so that stresses applied to the subgrade, from the superstructure and train loads, are reduced (through spreading) sufficiently to prevent failure of the subgrade by excessive deformation (plastic strain) or progressive shearing of the soil (Selig & Waters, 1994). Historically, the depth of the granular layer needed to prevent failure was estimated on the basis of experience (Heath et al, 1972), with standards generally using equations developed empiricallyfor example, the American Railway Engineering Association manual (AREA, 1996) and the Union Internationale des Chemins de fer Code 719R (UIC, 1994). Raymond (1985) modified the AREA design method using the Casagrande soil classification system (Casagrande, 1948) to relate safe bearing pressure to subgrade types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%