2014
DOI: 10.3788/ope.20142203.0633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of crescent driving electrodes for digital electrowetting-on-dielectric devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, LB4 always keep the shortest one and a smaller diameter of crescent electrode even can shorten LB. But on the other hand, as in Fig.3, LB is limited by the diameter of droplet due to the onset TCL needed which has discussed in [21]. If we need a same force (FEWOD1= FEWOD2= FEWOD3= FEWOD4) to keep the same R2 the fourth shape always cost the shortest L. It also means the opposite layout of crescent electrode shape can keep the smallest value of R2 which benefit the splitting of droplet.…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Obviously, LB4 always keep the shortest one and a smaller diameter of crescent electrode even can shorten LB. But on the other hand, as in Fig.3, LB is limited by the diameter of droplet due to the onset TCL needed which has discussed in [21]. If we need a same force (FEWOD1= FEWOD2= FEWOD3= FEWOD4) to keep the same R2 the fourth shape always cost the shortest L. It also means the opposite layout of crescent electrode shape can keep the smallest value of R2 which benefit the splitting of droplet.…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 88%