2017
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201701436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Cyanovinylene‐Containing Polymer Acceptors with Large Dipole Moment Change for Efficient Charge Generation in High‐Performance All‐Polymer Solar Cells

Abstract: over fullerene-based PSCs, including easily tunable polymer properties, simultaneous light absorption by both donors and acceptors, and enhanced stability against mechanical and thermal stresses. [1] However, few all-PSCs have been reported to exhibit power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) higher than 7%, as many systems have relatively low short-circuit current densities (J SC ) and fill factors (FF). [1d,e,2] The low performance of all-PSCs is mainly attributed to (i) low electron mobility of polymer accep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All‐polymer solar cells (all‐PSCs) that contain both p‐type and n‐type polymeric materials blended together as light‐absorption layers have attracted much attention, since the blend of a polymeric donor and acceptor should present superior photochemical, thermal, and mechanical stability to those of fullerene‐based PSCs. For example, by comparing the thermal and photostabilities of all‐PSCs and fullerene‐based PSCs based on the same polymer donor, all‐PSCs exhibited remarkable thermal and photostabilities, while the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of devices based on fullerene derivatives decreased rapidly upon thermal annealing or light illumination .…”
Section: Device Data For All‐pscs With Different Etlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All‐polymer solar cells (all‐PSCs) that contain both p‐type and n‐type polymeric materials blended together as light‐absorption layers have attracted much attention, since the blend of a polymeric donor and acceptor should present superior photochemical, thermal, and mechanical stability to those of fullerene‐based PSCs. For example, by comparing the thermal and photostabilities of all‐PSCs and fullerene‐based PSCs based on the same polymer donor, all‐PSCs exhibited remarkable thermal and photostabilities, while the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of devices based on fullerene derivatives decreased rapidly upon thermal annealing or light illumination .…”
Section: Device Data For All‐pscs With Different Etlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high PCE of the device based on P44 is attributed to the improved charge transport and enhanced light absorption coefficient. P45 was chosen as an acceptor due to its miscibility with BDT based monomers (Cho et al, 2018).…”
Section: Thieno[34-b]thiophene (Tt) Ring Based Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, introducing the cyano group rendered the LUMO more delocalized along the backbone, which improved the polymer μ e,SCLC . A highly encouraging PCE of 7.4 % with a large V oc of 0.94 V and a sizable FF of 65 % was achieved when 28 a was mixed with D11 (Figure ) as the donor polymer . Facchetti and co‐workers reported a series of NDI‐based polymers with tailored π‐conjugation length by introducing non‐conjugated units into the main chain.…”
Section: Ndi‐based Polymer Semiconductorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thel arger Dm ge should facilitatee xciton dissociation by reducing the coulombic attraction and exciton binding energy.A dditionally,i ntroducing the cyano group rendered the LUMO more delocalized along the backbone, which improved the polymer m e,SCLC .Ahighly encouraging PCE of 7.4 %w ith al arge V oc of 0.94 Vand as izable FF of 65 %w as achieved when 28 a wasm ixed with D11 ( Figure 2) as the donor polymer. [40] Facchetti andco-workers reportedaseries of NDI-based polymers with tailored p-conjugation length by introducing non-conjugated units into the main chain.P olymers 29 were synthesized from NDI with different ratios of the conjugated TVT (dithienylvinylene)and non-conjugated TET( dithienylethane) co-monomerss howeds ignificant differences in thermal, optoelectronic, morphological, and charge transport properties. Increasing the TET content resulted in al ower melting point, blueshifted absorption, and reduced crystallinity accompanied by the change of polymer chain orientation from face-on for PNDI-TVT100t oahighly crystallized structure as its unconnected analog like for PNDI-TET100.A st he LUMO is mainly located on the NDI and the HOMO is delocalized along the polymer backbone, electron transport was less affectedc ompared with the m h,OTFT ,a nd the m e,OTFT was reduced to 0.3 cm 2 V À1 s À1 ,h alf of that of parent polymer,w hen 60 %T ET was incorporated into the backbone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%