1991
DOI: 10.1109/4.92025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of digital filters for advanced telecommunications ASIC's using a special-purpose silicon compiler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a comparison between the number of operations required by different methods, we also selected several typical filter implementations with finite-impulse-response (FIR) or infiniteimpulse-response (IIR) [24][25][26], as shown in Table III. Table III does not give an exhaustive description of possible filters structures, but rather some estimates about the expected complexity of the filtering part.…”
Section: Complexity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a comparison between the number of operations required by different methods, we also selected several typical filter implementations with finite-impulse-response (FIR) or infiniteimpulse-response (IIR) [24][25][26], as shown in Table III. Table III does not give an exhaustive description of possible filters structures, but rather some estimates about the expected complexity of the filtering part.…”
Section: Complexity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three proposed methods provide a significant decrease in complexity, similar to the ambiguous BOC technique (but the performance of the unambiguous techniques is typically much better than that of a BOC technique, as it was shown in Section 5). The greater the maximum delay search range is, the greater the gap between the [25] IIR loss less discrete integrators [26] Multiplications proposed methods' complexity and the existing methods' complexity. Modified M&H and modified B&F methods have the same complexity, therefore the modified B&F method is to be preferred between the two, since it gives slightly better performance.…”
Section: Complexity Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%