2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of double-shelled NiS-FeS@NC hollow nanocubes for high-performance sodium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After repeated cycling at 0.2 A g –1 for 20 cycles enabling the slow activation of active materials, the electrode of NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs presents a reversible capacity of 365 mA h g –1 in the first cycle, which rapidly decays to 346 mA h g –1 in the second cycle and gradually maintains at a level of 342 mA h g –1 with a capacity retention of 93.5% after 1100 cycles. Compared with previously reported Ni-based or Fe-based anodes, ,, NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs demonstrates superior long-term cycling performance (Table S2). Meanwhile, NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs exhibits a reasonably high ICE of 88.5%, which increases to almost 100% in the second cycle and stabilizes at this value during the subsequent cycling process, demonstrating the robust and stable structure of NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After repeated cycling at 0.2 A g –1 for 20 cycles enabling the slow activation of active materials, the electrode of NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs presents a reversible capacity of 365 mA h g –1 in the first cycle, which rapidly decays to 346 mA h g –1 in the second cycle and gradually maintains at a level of 342 mA h g –1 with a capacity retention of 93.5% after 1100 cycles. Compared with previously reported Ni-based or Fe-based anodes, ,, NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs demonstrates superior long-term cycling performance (Table S2). Meanwhile, NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs exhibits a reasonably high ICE of 88.5%, which increases to almost 100% in the second cycle and stabilizes at this value during the subsequent cycling process, demonstrating the robust and stable structure of NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The cycling performance at 1 A g –1 is depicted in Figure D, delivering a reversible capacity of 256 mA h g –1 after 100 cycles with an 82.2% capacity retention. According to Figure E, it shows excellent rate capabilities of 327, 293, 268, 238, and 160 mA h g –1 at stepwise current densities of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 A g –1 , respectively, which are superior to those of MnS/FeS 2 @CNFs//NVP/C, CoS/Co 9 S 8 @NC//NVP@C, FeS/NiS@NCS//C-NVPF, NiS-FeS@NC//NVP@C, and Fe-CoS 2 /NC//NVP (Figure F). In addition, compared with other full cells, such as NTP@rGO//NVP/C, CuO-P//NVPOF, FeS 2‑x Se x //NVP, and CNT//NVP, the NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs//NVP full cell delivers a high energy density of 109.1 W h kg –1 at a power density of 63.4 W kg –1 (Figure S12), demonstrating the promising feasibility of NiS 2 /FeS 2 @MCNFs as anode for application in SIBs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More interestingly, the Co 3 S 4 /NiS@N‐C electrode has a significantly better rate capability, as evidenced by its 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 times higher reversible capacity at 30.0 A g −1 in comparison to the Co 3 S 4 /NiS, Co 3 S 4 , and NiS electrodes. Meanwhile, a comprehensive comparison of specific capacity against the current rate between Co 3 S 4 /NiS@N‐C and state‐of‐art Co 3 S 4 or NiS‐based anodes for SIBs was conducted, we can see that the Co 3 S 4 /NiS@N‐C electrode stands out on the electrochemical performance among those of SIB anodes (Figure 4D) 18,21,54,55,60–69 establishing that the self‐constructed electric field stemmed from the Co 3 S 4 /NiS heterogeneous interface together with the outer‐carbon encapsulation on the Co 3 S 4 /NiS nanosphere surface considerably enhance the rate performance reversibility and electrochemical reaction kinetics. Moreover, by graphing the connection between average charge voltage and current rate at a charge potential platform of ∼1.52 V through the GCD curves of four electrodes (Figure S12) at different rates, a comparison of structural pulverization for four electrodes at different rates was conducted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%