2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.21.22281330
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of effective outpatient sentinel surveillance for COVID-19 decision-making: a modeling study

Abstract: BackgroundDecision-makers impose COVID-19 mitigations based on public health indicators such as reported cases, which are sensitive to fluctuations in supply and demand for diagnostic testing, and hospital admissions, which lag infections by up to two weeks. Imposing mitigations too early has unnecessary economic costs, while imposing too late leads to uncontrolled epidemics with unnecessary cases and deaths. Sentinel surveillance of recently-symptomatic individuals in outpatient testing sites may overcome bia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our models adjusted for various variables, there may be unaccounted or unmeasured factors that in uence case incidence. Furthermore, it's worth noting that SARI sentinel surveillance provides information from severe cases, and implementing similar models on ILI sentinel surveillance could allow for even earlier outbreak detection capacities (34). This couldn't be evaluated in this study due to the interruption of ILI surveillance during the rst two years of the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our models adjusted for various variables, there may be unaccounted or unmeasured factors that in uence case incidence. Furthermore, it's worth noting that SARI sentinel surveillance provides information from severe cases, and implementing similar models on ILI sentinel surveillance could allow for even earlier outbreak detection capacities (34). This couldn't be evaluated in this study due to the interruption of ILI surveillance during the rst two years of the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%