2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2017.2653720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of Efficient Multiplierless Modified Cosine-Based Comb Decimation Filters: Analysis and Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example 2 : In this example, we compare the filter from Figure 4 with classic CIC filter [1], multistage filters [2–4], and single‐stage sharpened filter [7]. Table 2 shows the maximum passband deviation, minimum folding‐band attenuation, and the number of APOS of these filters.…”
Section: Filter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Example 2 : In this example, we compare the filter from Figure 4 with classic CIC filter [1], multistage filters [2–4], and single‐stage sharpened filter [7]. Table 2 shows the maximum passband deviation, minimum folding‐band attenuation, and the number of APOS of these filters.…”
Section: Filter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach is utilized in multistage decimation filters. State‐of‐the‐art methods for their design usually consider two stages [2–6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the cosine filters are introduced in [5]. Different authors adopted results in mathematics to improve comb aliasing rejection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction: Multiplierless decimation filters are used as building blocks in high-speed multirate systems. Various methods for their design have been considered, resulting in the cascaded-integrator-comb (CIC) filter [1], sharpened CIC (SCIC) filters [2,3], and several filters obtained by modification of the original CIC response [4][5][6][7]. All filters referred to introduce passband droop, which is especially high for SCIC filters utilising folding-band sharpening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our compensator with L = 5 and B = 6 provides the same deviation, but it requires only seven adders. Its coefficients are ĉ= [-1 + 2 7 , −2 3 -2 5 , −1 + 2 3 ]. Our next example illustrates the compensation of various minimax [3] and Chebyshev [2] SCIC filters with ω p > π/5 and R = 32.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%