2005
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2005.a1430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of fan beam optical sensor and its application in mass flow rate measurement of pneumatically conveyed solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum pole intensity statistical result (ABE: accumulative back extrusion, CDE: conventional direct extrusion, HE: hot extrusion, CVCDE: continuous variable channel direction extrusion, SE: staggered extrusion, OLTE: online twist extrusion, AABE: accumulative alternating back extrusion, EAMPR: extrusion and multi‐pass rolling, CWE: continuous welding extrusion). [ 39,42–49 ] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum pole intensity statistical result (ABE: accumulative back extrusion, CDE: conventional direct extrusion, HE: hot extrusion, CVCDE: continuous variable channel direction extrusion, SE: staggered extrusion, OLTE: online twist extrusion, AABE: accumulative alternating back extrusion, EAMPR: extrusion and multi‐pass rolling, CWE: continuous welding extrusion). [ 39,42–49 ] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voltage was chosen by checking the current change from 0.01 until 0.05 at which points the stated voltages were chosen [14,16,17]. We used only one sensor to proceed with the infrared experiment to ensure a constant detected value [20,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. As we know, infrared can't be seen with the naked eye, we can see the pattern of infrared light coming out from the lens and from the infrared component itself [18,26,33,37,40,41,52,55,56].…”
Section: Experiments Results For Infrared Light Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison value captured by the sensor for the result without the lens and a convex lens are not so different but they still show a difference of around 0.01 V. In terms of the tests without a lens and with the convex lens, the values captured by the sensor are different; that for the convex lens is less than that without the lens. This happened due to the changing pattern of light when the convex lens was applied but the graph pattern is still the same due to the thickness making the reading from the sensor decrease [20,22,48,49,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]. Base on properties of tissue on the subject are used in this experiment, they have unstable refractive index because of the properties and make the data have different gradient happen and show in Figure 4.3.…”
Section: Experiments Results For Infrared Light Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, if every semiconductor laser works, there are 5×5 projection data gathered by detectors at 5×5 orientation angles. In this experimental system [2] , a semiconductor laser with 650nm wavelength, 4mW output power, a collimating lens and an APC circuit is employed. Cylindrical lens embedded in front of a collimating lens transfers the light beam into a 50 o lamellar fan-beam with 2.5mm thickness in turn through the gas-solid two phase flow.…”
Section: Spatial Arrangement Structure Of the Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%